Literature DB >> 16185140

A survey of emergency medical services in mountain areas of Europe and North America: official recommendations of the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR Medcom).

Hermann Brugger1, Fidel Elsensohn, Dave Syme, Günther Sumann, Markus Falk.   

Abstract

Survey of on-site treatment of patients in mountain areas of 14 countries in Europe and North America (nonresponder rate 33%) to compare emergency medical services. Around 37,535 ground rescuers and 747 helicopters are ready for evacuation of casualties and patients in mountain areas. And 1316 physicians and 50,967 paramedics take part in ground and air mountain rescue operations. In Europe, 63.2% of helicopters have a physician on board, 17.8% are staffed with a paramedic, and 19% have no medically trained personnel on board. In North America, 31.6% (p < 0.001) of helicopters are staffed with a doctor, 59.3% (p < 0.001) with a paramedic, and 9.1% (p < 0.001) have no medical personnel. The percentage of on-site treatment according to the recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) or International Commission for Alpine Rescue (ICAR) varies among all countries (p < 0.001) and is positively related to the percentage of physician-staffed helicopters (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Paramedics in 90.9% countries are obliged to be medically trained, but physicians only need to have a standardized training in emergency medicine in 50% (p < 0.042). On-site treatment according to ILCOR or ICAR recommendations is performed more often in countries where physicians are regularly involved in mountain rescue operations. However, no conclusions can be drawn from the data as to the efficiency of treatment. The data show a lack of medical education in specific, mountain rescue-related problems. Physicians involved should undergo suitable training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16185140     DOI: 10.1089/ham.2005.6.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Alt Med Biol        ISSN: 1527-0297            Impact factor:   1.981


  6 in total

1.  Exploration of key stakeholders' preferences for pre-hospital physiologic monitoring by emergency rescue services.

Authors:  Alasdair J Mort; Gordon F Rushworth
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  [Deployment and efficacy of ground versus helicopter emergency service for severely injured patients. Analysis of a nationwide Swiss trauma center].

Authors:  S Günkel; M König; R Albrecht; M Brüesch; R Lefering; K Sprengel; C M L Werner; H-P Simmen; G A Wanner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Wilderness medicine.

Authors:  Douglas G Sward; Brad L Bennett
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2014

4.  Factors impacting on the activation and approach times of helicopter emergency medical services in four Alpine countries.

Authors:  Iztok Tomazin; Miljana Vegnuti; John Ellerton; Oliver Reisten; Guenther Sumann; Janko Kersnik
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The Use of E-Learning in Medical Education for Mountain Rescuers Concerning Hypothermia.

Authors:  Paweł Podsiadło; Sylweriusz Kosiński; Tomasz Darocha; Kinga Sałapa; Tomasz Sanak; Hermann Brugger
Journal:  High Alt Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.981

6.  An analysis of patients evacuated by a civilian physician-staffed helicopter from a military base.

Authors:  Youichi Yanagawa; Hiroki Nagasawa; Ikuto Takuchi; Shunsuke Madokoro; Kei Jitsuiki; Hiromichi Ohsaka; Kouhei Ishikawa; Kazuhiko Omori
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2019-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.