Literature DB >> 16184457

The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer.

Cynthia Osborne1, Glenn V Ostir, Xianglin Du, M Kristen Peek, James S Goodwin.   

Abstract

Research indicates an association between marital status and health but this link has not been thoroughly explored. Our goal was to examine the association of marital status on the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer and the potential role socioeconomic status, education level, and comorbidities may play in explaining these associations. Retrospective cohort study using linked Medicare and National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. The sample consisted of 32,268 women aged 65 years and older who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 1991 to 1995. Information available through 1998 allowed for 3 years of follow-up. Results showed that unmarried women were more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer stage II-IV versus stage I and in situ (OR 1.17; CI95 1.12, 1.23). Unmarried women diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer were less likely to receive definitive therapy (OR 1.24; CI95 1.17, 1.31). Even after controlling for cancer stage and size at diagnosis and treatment received, unmarried women were at an increased risk of death from breast cancer (HR 1.25; CI95 1.14, 1.37). Socioeconomic variables and comorbidity had little impact on the relationship between marital status and survival. Older married women were at decreased risk for mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Many of the health benefits enjoyed by married women are likely derived from increased social support and social networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16184457     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-005-3702-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  98 in total

1.  Predictors of supportive message expression and reception in an interactive cancer communication system.

Authors:  Eunkyung Kim; Jeong Yeob Han; Dhavan Shah; Bret Shaw; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson; David Fan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-22

2.  Factors influencing chemotherapy knowledge in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Pearman D Parker; Sue P Heiney; Swann Arp Adams; Daniela B Friedman; Robin M Dawson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Disparities in the treatment of patients with IL-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Christopher M Deibert; Julie Lai; Matthias Schonlau
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Variations in Guideline-Concordant Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy in Rural Georgia.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Kevin C Ward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Religiosity Level and Mammography Performance Among Arab and Jewish Women in Israel.

Authors:  Ronit Pinchas-Mizrachi; Amy Solnica; Nihaya Daoud
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2020-10-29

6.  Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Xiaozhong Wen; Victoria Wilcox; Kate McCarthy-Barnett; Jeanne Panarace; Carol Manning; Susan Allen; William Rakowski
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009-09-23

Review 7.  Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Factors affecting receipt of chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Libby Morimoto; Jenna Coalson; Fionna Mowat; Cynthia O'Malley
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

9.  Delay in diagnostic testing after abnormal mammography in low-income women.

Authors:  Debra Wujcik; Yu Shyr; Ming Li; Margaret F Clayton; Lee Ellington; Usha Menon; Kathi Mooney
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Patient and process factors associated with late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in Safety-Net patients: a pilot prospective study.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Donna B Jeffe; Leisha Elmore; Deborah N Ksiazek; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.