Xianglin L Du1, Dennie V Jones, Dong Zhang. 1. School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Herman Pressler Drive, RAS-E631, Houston, TX 77030, USA. xdu@sph.uth.tmc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have shown the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in treating node-positive operable breast cancer in women aged < or = 69 years, but the benefit of chemotherapy in women aged > or = 70 is questionable. This study was to examine if adjuvant chemotherapy is effective for these women with breast cancer. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 5464 women diagnosed with node-positive operable breast cancer at age > or = 65 in 1992 through 1996 with last follow-up of December 31, 1999 in five states and six metropolitan areas. Hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was used for survival analysis with adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics; propensity analysis was used to control for observed factors; and sensitivity analysis was used to estimate potential effects of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: After adjusting for propensity to receive chemotherapy, the chemotherapy-treated and untreated groups were not statistically significantly different for covariates except for age and hormone receptor status. Mortality was significantly reduced in women aged 65-69 who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (HR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.88) or after adjusting for propensity scores (HR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). HR did not significantly differ between the treated and untreated women aged > or = 70 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83-1.09, and HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.87-1.14). These results were relatively insensitive to changes in unmeasured confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in women with node-positive operable breast cancer aged 65-69 living in the community, but not in women aged > or = 70. These findings are consistent with those found in randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have shown the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in treating node-positive operable breast cancer in women aged < or = 69 years, but the benefit of chemotherapy in women aged > or = 70 is questionable. This study was to examine if adjuvant chemotherapy is effective for these women with breast cancer. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 5464 women diagnosed with node-positive operable breast cancer at age > or = 65 in 1992 through 1996 with last follow-up of December 31, 1999 in five states and six metropolitan areas. Hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was used for survival analysis with adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics; propensity analysis was used to control for observed factors; and sensitivity analysis was used to estimate potential effects of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: After adjusting for propensity to receive chemotherapy, the chemotherapy-treated and untreated groups were not statistically significantly different for covariates except for age and hormone receptor status. Mortality was significantly reduced in women aged 65-69 who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (HR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.88) or after adjusting for propensity scores (HR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). HR did not significantly differ between the treated and untreated women aged > or = 70 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83-1.09, and HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.87-1.14). These results were relatively insensitive to changes in unmeasured confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in women with node-positive operable breast cancer aged 65-69 living in the community, but not in women aged > or = 70. These findings are consistent with those found in randomized controlled trials.
Authors: P Eifel; J A Axelson; J Costa; J Crowley; W J Curran; A Deshler; S Fulton; C B Hendricks; M Kemeny; A B Kornblith; T A Louis; M Markman; R Mayer; D Roter Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-07-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; George L Delclos; Kim Waller; Dong Zhang Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Xianglin L Du; Wenyaw Chan; Sharon Giordano; Jane M Geraci; George L Delclos; Keith Burau; Shenying Fang Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shelley M Enger; Soe Soe Thwin; Diana S M Buist; Terry Field; Floyd Frost; Ann M Geiger; Timothy L Lash; Marianne Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Soe Soe Thwin; Ann M Geiger; Diana S M Buist; Marianne N Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Reina Haque; Feifei Wei; Timothy L Lash Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Sharon H Giordano; Yong-Fang Kuo; Zhigang Duan; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Jean Freeman; James S Goodwin Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Diana S M Buist; Jessica Chubak; Marianne Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Jaclyn L F Bosco; Soe Soe Thwin; Heather Taffet Gold; Cynthia Owusu; Terry S Field; Virginia P Quinn; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan; Kanan Patel; Ravi V Desai; Momanna B Ahmed; Gregg C Fonarow; Daniel E Forman; Michel White; Inmaculada B Aban; Thomas E Love; Wilbert S Aronow; Richard M Allman; Stefan D Anker; Ali Ahmed Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 6.053