Literature DB >> 16183690

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: potential adjunct for risk stratification in patients with stable congestive heart failure.

Nicolas Lamblin1, Frédéric Mouquet, Bernadette Hennache, Joël Dagorn, Sophie Susen, Christophe Bauters, Pascal de Groote.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the potential adjunct of high-sensitivity (hs) C-reactive protein for risk stratification in patients with stable congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 546 consecutive patients clinically stable with an ejection fraction <45% who were referred to our centre for evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction. hs C-reactive protein levels were determined on blood samples obtained on entry into the study. Clinical follow-up (median 972 days) was obtained for 545 patients. Cardiovascular mortality was significantly increased (P=0.001) in patients with hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L. By multivariable analysis, including clinical, biological, and echocardiographic variables, hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality [HR=1.78 (1.17-2.72); P=0.008]; the strongest predictive parameter in this model was B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (P=0.005). When peak VO(2) was included into the model, hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L remained an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality [HR=1.55 (1.02-2.38); P=0.04]; the strongest predictive parameter in this model was peak VO(2) (P<0.0001). In patients with ischaemic CHF, cardiovascular mortality was significantly increased in patients with hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L (P=0.001), whereas in patients with non-ischaemic CHF, hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L was not associated with cardiovascular mortality (P=0.098). By multivariable analysis, hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in ischaemic patients [HR=2.16 (1.23-3.78)] but not in non-ischaemic patients [HR=1.05 (0.52-2.11)].
CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular mortality is increased in CHF patients with hs C-reactive protein >3 mg/L. The impact of hs C-reactive protein is independent of usual prognostic parameters, in particular BNP and peak VO(2). The interest of hs C-reactive protein determination appears to be especially marked in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16183690     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  23 in total

1.  Clinical predictors of response to anakinra in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Justin M Canada; Benjamin W Van Tassell; Sanah Christopher; Claudia Oddi; Nayef A Abouzaki; Michael L Gambill; George Mueller; Ryan Melchior; Keyur B Shah; Charles A Dinarello; Antonio Abbate; Ross Arena
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Protein biomarkers identify patients unlikely to benefit from primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD).

Authors:  Alan Cheng; Yiyi Zhang; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Darshan Dalal; Barbara Butcher; Sanaz Norgard; Zayd Eldadah; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Timm Dickfeld; David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine; Eliseo Guallar; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 3.  Reappraisal of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Thanat Chaikijurajai; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-02

4.  Interleukin-6 is a stronger prognostic predictor than high-sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with chronic stable heart failure.

Authors:  Borut Jug; Barbara Guzic Salobir; Nina Vene; Miran Sebestjen; Miso Sabovic; Irena Keber
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  C-reactive protein, diastolic dysfunction, and risk of heart failure in patients with coronary disease: Heart and Soul Study.

Authors:  Eric S Williams; Sanjiv J Shah; Sadia Ali; Bee Ya Na; Nelson B Schiller; Mary A Whooley
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Inflammatory biomarkers are not predictive of intermediate-term risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in stable CHF patients.

Authors:  Yuval Konstantino; Jairo Kusniec; Tamar Reshef; Ofer David-Zadeh; Alexander Mazur; Boris Strasberg; Alexander Battler; Moti Haim
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  The Effect of Emergency Department Visits and Inflammatory Markers on One-Year Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Ataman Köse; Ahmet Çelik; Ersin Altınsoy; Seyran Bozkurt Babus; Semra Erdoğan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 8.  Rosuvastatin, inflammation, C-reactive protein, JUPITER, and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease--a perspective.

Authors:  Richard Kones
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  The Utility of Circulating and Imaging Biomarkers Alone and in Combination in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Biyanka Jaltotage; Girish Dwivedi; Daryl Eng Lee Ooi; Gnanadevan Mahadavan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021

Review 10.  Do optimal prognostic thresholds in continuous physiological variables really exist? Analysis of origin of apparent thresholds, with systematic review for peak oxygen consumption, ejection fraction and BNP.

Authors:  Alberto Giannoni; Resham Baruah; Tora Leong; Michaela B Rehman; Luigi Emilio Pastormerlo; Frank E Harrell; Andrew J S Coats; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.