Literature DB >> 16183420

Trends in intravenous iron use among dialysis patients in the United States (1994-2002).

Wendy L St Peter1, Gregorio T Obrador, Tricia L Roberts, Allan J Collins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two new intravenous (IV) iron products, ferric gluconate and iron sucrose, recently were approved for use in the United States. We report trends in IV iron use in both incident (1994 to 2001) and prevalent (1994 to 2002) Medicare US dialysis patients.
METHODS: Included patients had Medicare as a primary payer. Recombinant human erythropoietin doses, IV iron use, and hemoglobin data were obtained from Medicare outpatient files. The most recent cohorts included 241,770 prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients in 2002 and 11,744 incident HD patients in 2001.
RESULTS: For incident HD patients in the first 9 months of dialysis therapy, the percentage of patients administered IV iron increased sharply between 1994 and 1997 and then increased gradually between 1997 and 2001. In 2002, a total of 84.4% of HD and 19.3% of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients were administered IV iron. Ferric gluconate use increased slowly in 2000, increased from 5.7% to 18.6% from December 2000 to January 2001, increased to 29.8% in April 2002, and was 23.3% in December 2002. Iron sucrose use increased to 26% by December 2002. The absolute monthly percentage of HD patients administered IV iron dextran decreased from 49.6% in January 2000 to 3.6% in December 2002.
CONCLUSION: In US patients with end-stage renal disease, IV iron use has increased, although slowly, from 1997 to 2002. Ferric gluconate and iron sucrose have become the predominant form of therapy. IV iron therapy was used in a much smaller percentage of PD compared with HD patients, and racial and geographic variability was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16183420     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  7 in total

1.  Testing two (of several) intravenous iron dosing strategies in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Margaret K Yu; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

2.  Impact of European medicines agency recommendations for hypersensitivity reactions on intravenous iron prescription in haemodialysis centres of the Lombardy region.

Authors:  Rodolfo F Rivera; Davide Guido; Lucia Del Vecchio; Enzo Corghi; Marco D'Amico; Corrado Camerini; Donatella Spotti; Andrea Galassi; Claudio Pozzi; Giovanni Cancarini; Giuseppe Pontoriero; Francesco Locatelli
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Intravenous iron sucrose for children with iron deficiency anemia: a single institution study.

Authors:  Elpis Mantadakis; Emmanouela Tsouvala; Varvara Xanthopoulou; Athanassios Chatzimichael
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Trends and variations in intravenous vitamin D use among hemodialysis patients in the United States.

Authors:  Anne C Beaubrun; M Alan Brookhart; Betsy Sleath; Lily Wang; Abhijit V Kshirsagar
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 5.  Iron therapy for renal anemia: how much needed, how much harmful?

Authors:  Walter H Hörl
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Utilization Patterns of IV Iron and Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents in Anemic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Multihospital Study.

Authors:  Avani D Joshi; David A Holdford; Donald F Brophy; Spencer E Harpe; Darcy Mays; Todd W B Gehr
Journal:  Anemia       Date:  2012-04-19

7.  Effective achievement of hemoglobin stability with once-monthly C.E.R.A. in peritoneal dialysis patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Michael Koch; Wolfgang Treiber; Danilo Fliser
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.