Literature DB >> 16182984

Most lay people can correctly identify indigenous venomous snakes.

Stephen W Corbett1, Brian Anderson, Brett Nelson, Sean Bush, William K Hayes, Mike D Cardwell.   

Abstract

We attempted to determine how accurately members of the public can identify venomous snakes. Six different snakes indigenous to southern California were displayed in cages for 265 people to view at a street fair. These included 4 nonvenomous snakes and 2 venomous snakes. People were asked whether the snake was venomous and the name of the snake, if they knew it. Overall, people recognized whether a snake was venomous or nonvenomous 81% of the time. They were most accurate at identifying rattlesnakes as being venomous (95%) but incorrectly identified nonvenomous snakes as being venomous 25% of the time. Men were more accurate than women, and adults were more accurate than children. Subjects were less well able to identify the exact species of snakes. The results suggest that there may be no need to capture, kill, or bring a snake to the hospital for identification, at least in this geographic area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182984     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ethics and Medical Toxicology Research.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman; Andrew Stolbach
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-24

2.  Species identification skills predict in-depth knowledge about species.

Authors:  Michiel Jan Dirk Hooykaas; Menno Schilthuizen; Casper Johannes Albers; Ionica Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Neurotoxicity in snakebite--the limits of our knowledge.

Authors:  Udaya K Ranawaka; David G Lalloo; H Janaka de Silva
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-10-10

4.  Public perceptions of snakes and snakebite management: implications for conservation and human health in southern Nepal.

Authors:  Deb Prasad Pandey; Gita Subedi Pandey; Kamal Devkota; Matt Goode
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.733

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.