Literature DB >> 16182936

Ethics, methodology and the use of placebo controls in surgical trials.

Stephen Polgar1, Joanna Ng.   

Abstract

There is an emergent view among North American researchers and bioethicists that not only is the use of sham surgery ethical, but that it should also be mandatory when conducting trials to evaluate surgical procedures such as neural grafting. This view is based on erroneous assumptions concerning the magnitude of the placebo effects associated with surgery. A detailed analysis of four recent clinical trials failed to provide consistent evidence for pronounced and long term improvements in sham operated patients. There was no evidence that the results of the placebo control groups were necessary for identifying unsafe and ineffectual surgical procedures. We contend that the advancement of clinical science and the protection of individual patients are best guaranteed by adopting the principles of evidence-based medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182936     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in clinical neuroscience research: a patient's perspective.

Authors:  Perry D Cohen; Linda Herman; Sheryl Jedlinski; Peggy Willocks; Paula Wittekind
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Randomized sham-controlled trials in endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events.

Authors:  Allison R Schulman; Violeta Popov; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Randomised clinical trials in surgery: a look at the ethical and practical issues.

Authors:  Anjan Kumar Das
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  When ethics constrains clinical research: trial design of control arms in "greater than minimal risk" pediatric trials.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Dolan Sondhi; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 5.695

5.  The ethics of sham surgery on research subjects with cognitive impairments that affect decision-making capacity.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Frank Miller
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Placebo-controlled procedural trials for neurological conditions.

Authors:  Sam H Horng; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Strengthening the ethical assessment of placebo-controlled surgical trials: three proposals.

Authors:  Wendy Rogers; Katrina Hutchison; Zoë C Skea; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  Critical review of sham surgery clinical trials: Confounding factors analysis.

Authors:  Massimo Ciccozzi; Rosa Menga; Giovanna Ricci; Massimiliano Andrea Vitali; Silvia Angeletti; Ascanio Sirignano; Vittoradolfo Tambone
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-10-29

9.  Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines.

Authors:  Julian Savulescu; Karolina Wartolowska; Andy Carr
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Evidence-Based Evaluation of the Ethics of Sham Surgery for Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Stephen Polgar; Sheeza Mohamed
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.