Literature DB >> 16182774

Outcome of 118 pancreas transplants with retroperitoneal portal-enteric drainage.

U Boggi1, F Vistoli, S Signori, M Del Chiaro, G Amorese, T Vanadia Bartolo, C Croce, F Sgambelluri, P Marchetti, F Mosca.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have recently described a technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation (RPTx) with portal-enteric drainage (PED). Further experience with 118 RPTx is detailed herein.
METHODS: Between April 2001 and August 2004, 118 patients underwent RPTx with PED among 125 recipients (94.4%) scheduled for this procedure. Surgical complications and patient and graft survivals were recorded prospectively.
RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up period of 3 months (mean 27.8 +/- 13.0 months), 18 recipients (15.2%) required relaparotomy because of bleeding (n = 6; 5.1%), allograft pancreatectomy due to either hyperacute/accelerated rejection (n = 3; 2.5%) or vein thrombosis (n = 3; 2.5%), leak from duodenojejunal anastomosis (n = 2; 1.7%), bleeding and vein thrombectomy (n = 1; 0.8%), or small bowel occlusion due to bezoar (n = 1; 0.8%). One patient had a negative relaparotomy and one underwent two relaparotomies. Most patients with hemorrhage (5/7; 71.4%) were recipients of solitary pancreas grafts managed with heparin infusion. No venous thrombi extended into recipient's superior mesenteric vein. Nonocclusive venous thrombosis was diagnosed with duplex ultrasonography and confirmed at computed tomography in seven patients (5.1%). None of these patients lost graft function. Ten patients (8.5%) were diagnosed with peripancreatic fluid collections, all successfully treated by observation (n = 7) or percutaneous drainage (n = 3). Enteric bleeding occurred in eight recipients (6.8%). Overall, 1-year patient and pancreas survival rates were 97.4% and 92.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that RPTx with PED is a technical option that may be included in the repertoire of pancreas transplant surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182774     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.06.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

Review 1.  Body mass index and outcomes from pancreatic resection: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Ramsey; Robert C Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Whole-organ pancreas transplantation at Baylor Regional Transplant Institute: a chance to cure diabetes.

Authors:  Edmund Q Sanchez; Larry B Melton; Srinath Chinnakotla; Marlon F Levy; Bernard V Fischbach; Robert Goldstein; Göran B Klintmalm
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2010-01

3.  Intraoperative imaging of pancreas transplant allografts using indocyanine green with laser fluorescence.

Authors:  Edmund Q Sanchez; Srinath Chinnakotla; Tariq Khan; Dmitriy Nikitin; Sugam Vasani; Henry B Randall; Greg J McKenna; Richard Ruiz; Nicholas Onaca; Marlon F Levy; Robert M Goldstein; John C Docherty; David K Hurd; Göran B Klintmalm
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2008-07

Review 4.  [Pancreas and islet transplantation. The role in the treatment of diabetes mellitus].

Authors:  P Schenker; R Viebahn
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Extended pancreas donor program - the EXPAND study rationale and study protocol.

Authors:  Andrea Proneth; Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Florian Zeman; Johanna R Foerster; Ines Holub; Helmut Arbogast; Wolf O Bechstein; Thomas Becker; Carsten Dietz; Markus Guba; Michael Heise; Sven Jonas; Stephan Kersting; Jürgen Klempnauer; Steffen Manekeller; Volker Müller; Silvio Nadalin; Björn Nashan; Andreas Pascher; Falk Rauchfuss; Michael A Ströhlein; Peter Schemmer; Peter Schenker; Stefan Thorban; Thomas Vogel; Axel O Rahmel; Richard Viebahn; Bernhard Banas; Edward K Geissler; Hans J Schlitt; Stefan A Farkas
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2013-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.