Literature DB >> 16182666

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis is associated with reduced treatment intensity.

Erika J Sims1, Jonathan McCormick, Gita Mehta, Anil Mehta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the improved clinical status after newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) segregates with increased therapeutic intervention compared with presentation by clinical diagnosis (CD). STUDY
DESIGN: In 2002, two populations (1 to 9 years of age) who presented (excluding meconium ileus) by NBS < or = 3 months of age or by CD were compared in an observational, cross-sectional design. NBS and CD populations (184 and 950 patients, respectively) were divided into 3-year age groups (1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 9 years). Therapies of duration >3 months were compared together with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection status.
RESULTS: NBS patients < or = 6 years of age received significantly fewer and less demanding therapies not explained by age, genotype, geography, or social deprivation. In 7- to 9-year-olds, significantly fewer NBS patients received intravenous antibiotics. NBS patients without P aeruginosa infection received significantly fewer therapies, but no differences were found between intermittently or chronically infected NBS and CD populations. Comparable results were found in deltaF508/deltaF508 subpopulations.
CONCLUSIONS: CF populations diagnosed by NBS are associated with reduced treatment compared with age- and genotype-matched CD control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182666     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  7 in total

Review 1.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: do we need a second IRT?

Authors:  J F Price
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Cystic fibrosis: benefits and clinical outcome.

Authors:  K O McKay
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.982

3.  Delays in diagnosing cystic fibrosis: can we find ways to diagnose it earlier?

Authors:  Michelle Steinraths; Hilary D Vallance; A George F Davidson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Data Resource Profile: The UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry.

Authors:  David Taylor-Robinson; Olia Archangelidi; Siobhán B Carr; Rebecca Cosgriff; Elaine Gunn; Ruth H Keogh; Amy MacDougall; Simon Newsome; Daniela K Schlüter; Sanja Stanojevic; Diana Bilton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Impact of newborn screening on outcomes and social inequalities in cystic fibrosis: a UK CF registry-based study.

Authors:  Daniela K Schlüter; Kevin W Southern; Carol Dryden; Peter Diggle; David Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Early Diagnosis and Intervention in Cystic Fibrosis: Imagining the Unimaginable.

Authors:  Andrea M Coverstone; Thomas W Ferkol
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Cystic fibrosis carrier screening effects on birth prevalence and newborn screening.

Authors:  Carlo Castellani; Luigi Picci; Gloria Tridello; Elia Casati; Anna Tamanini; Lucia Bartoloni; Maurizio Scarpa; Baroukh M Assael
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.