Literature DB >> 16182353

Oxazepam does not modulate the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

Joshua A Lile1, William W Stoops, Frances P Wagner, Paul E A Glaser, Craig R Rush.   

Abstract

Benzodiazepines, which are gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA(A)) receptor positive modulators, can block the behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulants. In the present study, the ability of oxazepam, which may have less abuse potential compared to some other benzodiazepines, to attenuate the discriminative-stimulus, subject-rated and psychomotor performance effects of d-amphetamine in humans was determined. Six healthy participants (2 female, 4 male) learned to discriminate 15 mg oral d-amphetamine. After acquiring the discrimination (i.e., > or = 80% correct responding on 4 consecutive days), the effects of d-amphetamine (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 15 mg), alone and in combination with acutely administered oxazepam (0 and 20 mg) were assessed. d-Amphetamine alone functioned as a discriminative stimulus, produced stimulant-like subject-rated effects (e.g., increased ratings of Stimulated on a Drug-Effect Questionnaire) and enhanced psychomotor performance. Oxazepam alone increased subject ratings of sedation (e.g., increased ratings of Sluggish, Fatigued and Lazy on a Drug-Effect Questionnaire) and impaired psychomotor performance. Oxazepam alone did not occasion d-amphetamine-like discriminative-stimulus effects, and had no effect on the discriminative-stimulus or subject-rated effects of d-amphetamine when given in combination. The results of this experiment are discordant with previous research and suggest that benzodiazepines differ in their ability to modulate the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182353     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  5 in total

1.  Relationship between drug discrimination and ratings of subjective effects: implications for assessing and understanding the abuse potential of D-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  Anna R Reynolds; B Levi Bolin; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Discriminative-stimulus, subject-rated, and physiological effects of methamphetamine in humans pretreated with aripiprazole.

Authors:  Rajkumar J Sevak; Andrea R Vansickel; William W Stoops; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 3.  Human drug discrimination: A primer and methodological review.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Similar discriminative-stimulus effects of D-amphetamine in women and men.

Authors:  Andrea R Vansickel; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Substitution profile of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, triazolam, hydromorphone, and methylphenidate in humans discriminating Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; Thomas H Kelly; David J Pinsky; Lon R Hays
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.