Literature DB >> 16182349

Prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Tzu-I Wu1, Ting-Chang Chang, Swei Hsueh, Kuang-Hung Hsu, Hung-Hsueh Chou, Huei-Jean Huang, Chyong-Huey Lai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant therapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
METHODS: All cases with uterine LMS were retrieved from medical registry (1984 through 2003) of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. After excluding cases with initial surgery at outside the hospital, missing chart, and wrong pathologic diagnosis, 51 patients (41 for stage I, 7 for stage III, and 3 for stage IV) met the study criteria. Approximate stratified analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to adjust confounding factors.
RESULTS: The median follow-up for survivors was 47 months. Five-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 67.4% and 59.2% for the whole series. Multivariate Cox regression analyses selected age (>50 versus < or =50 years: relative risk [RR], 11.07 [95% CI 1.53-80.34]), tumor size (>11 versus < or =11 cm: RR, 11.63 [95% CI 2.14-63.12]), stage (III and IV versus I: RR, 21.24 [95% CI 2.20-204.98]), and adjuvant chemotherapy (yes versus no: RR, 0.08 [95% CI 0.01-0.81]) as significant predictors of death. Besides, surgical stage (P = 0.021), tumor size (P = 0.005), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.011) were significantly correlated with RFS. After approximate stratification, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy also significantly decreased RR of death.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to demonstrate benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for LMS despite the limitation of sample size and its retrospective nature. Prospective multicenter trials are necessary to clarify the role of chemotherapy, selecting criteria, and optimal chemotherapy regimen for uterine LMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182349     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  24 in total

Review 1.  A review of treatment of uterine leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Uterine leiomyosarcomas with osteoclast-like giant cells associated with high expression of RUNX2 and RANKL.

Authors:  Mika Terasaki; Yasuhiro Terasaki; Kyoko Wakamatsu; Naomi Kuwahara; Koichi Yoneyama; Rieko Kawase; Keisuke Kurose; Etsuko Toda; Yoko Endo; Shinobu Kunugi; Yusuke Kajimoto; Akira Shimizu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Mice-lacking LMP2, immuno-proteasome subunit, as an animal model of spontaneous uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Takuma Hayashi; Akiko Horiuchi; Kenji Sano; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Yae Kanai; Tanri Shiozawa; Susumu Tonegawa; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Synergistic effects of pazopanib and hyperthermia against uterine leiomyosarcoma growth mediated by downregulation of histone acetyltransferase 1.

Authors:  Chiao-Yun Lin; Angel Chao; Ren-Chin Wu; Li-Yu Lee; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Chia-Lung Tsai; Yun-Shien Lee; Meng-Ting Peng; Lan-Yan Yang; Huei-Jean Huang; Hsin-Shih Wang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Clinical Characteristics, Surgical Management and Adjuvant Therapy of Patients with Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: 27 Years of Experience.

Authors:  R Rothmund; M Huebner; C Joachim; A Hartkopf; T Fehm; M Bamberg; M Wallwiener; S Brucker; F A Taran
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma: analysis of 127 patients at a single institution, 1989-2007.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Uterine leiomyosarcoma: 14-year two-center experience of 31 cases.

Authors:  Woo Young Kim; Suk-Joon Chang; Ki-Hong Chang; Jong-Hyuck Yoon; Jang Hee Kim; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Molecular mechanisms of uterine leiomyosarcomas: involvement of defect in LMP2 expression.

Authors:  Takuma Hayashi; Yuto Shimamura; Taro Saegusa; Akiko Horiuchi; Yukihiro Kobayashi; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Yae Kanai; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Kenji Sano; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2008-07-22

Review 9.  Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities.

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; Athanasios-Meletios Dimopoulos; Stelios Fotiou; Vassilios Kouloulias; Christos A Papadimitriou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Development of a Multi-Institutional Prediction Model for Three-Year Survival Status in Patients with Uterine Leiomyosarcoma (AGOG11-022/QCGC1302 Study).

Authors:  Ka-Yu Tse; Richard Wing-Cheuk Wong; Angel Chao; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Lan-Yan Yang; Margaret Cummings; Deborah Smith; Chiung-Ru Lai; Hei-Yu Lau; Ming-Shyen Yen; Annie Nga-Yin Cheung; Charlotte Ka-Lun Leung; Kit-Sheung Chan; Alice Ngot-Htain Chan; Wai-Hon Li; Carmen Ka-Man Choi; Wai-Mei Pong; Hoi-Fong Hui; Judy Ying-Wah Yuk; Hung Yao; Nancy Wah-Fun Yuen; Andreas Obermair; Chyong-Huey Lai; Philip Pun-Ching Ip; Hextan Yuen-Sheung Ngan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.