Literature DB >> 16182335

Explicit estimation of visual uncertainty in human motion processing.

Erich W Graf1, Paul A Warren, Laurence T Maloney.   

Abstract

We examine whether human observers have explicit access to an estimate of their own uncertainty in extrapolating the motion trajectories of moving objects. Objects moved across a display area at constant speed changing direction at short time intervals. Each new direction was obtained by adding a random perturbation to the previous direction. The perturbation distribution was always symmetric with mean zero (no change in direction) but could differ in variability: objects with low directional variability tended to travel in straight lines while objects with high directional variability moved more erratically. Objects eventually disappeared behind the near edge of an occluder. Observers marked a 'capture region' along the far edge of the occluder that they estimated would contain the object when it re-emerged. We varied both occluder width and directional variability across trials and found that observers correctly compensated for these changes. We present a two-stage model of observer performance in which the visual system first estimates the directional variability of the object and then uses this estimate to set a capture region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182335     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

Review 1.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Integration of sensory evidence in motion discrimination.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual perception of the physical stability of asymmetric three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Roland W Fleming; Manish Singh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Visual extrapolation under risk: human observers estimate and compensate for exogenous uncertainty.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Erich W Graf; Rebecca A Champion; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  The role of uncertainty and reward on eye movements in a virtual driving task.

Authors:  Brian T Sullivan; Leif Johnson; Constantin A Rothkopf; Dana Ballard; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Continuous evolution of statistical estimators for optimal decision-making.

Authors:  Ian Saunders; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prospective decision making for randomly moving visual stimuli.

Authors:  Ryuto Yashiro; Hiromi Sato; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Strategic allocation of working memory resource.

Authors:  Aspen H Yoo; Zuzanna Klyszejko; Clayton E Curtis; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.