Literature DB >> 16182120

An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32).

A Brédart1, A Bottomley, J M Blazeby, T Conroy, C Coens, S D'Haese, Wei-Chu Chie, E Hammerlid, J I Arraras, F Efficace, C Rodary, S Schraub, M Costantini, A Costantini, F Joly, O Sezer, D Razavi, M Mehlitz, M Bielska-Lasota, N K Aaronson.   

Abstract

Little is known about patients' satisfaction with care in oncology hospitals across cultural contexts. Within the EORTC, we developed a 32-item satisfaction with care questionnaire to measure patients' appraisal of hospital doctors and nurses, as well as aspects of care organisation and services. This study assessed the psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32, in a large, international sample of patients with cancer. Patients discharged from a surgery or medical oncology ward in nine countries were invited to complete at home the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 as well as other instruments for psychometric testing. Of 762 eligible patients recruited, 15% failed to return the questionnaire. Of the 647 compliant patients, 63% completed the questionnaires within 15 min and 82% required no help in its completion. Multitrait scaling analysis revealed excellent internal consistency and convergent validity, although some scales within the IN-PATSAT32 were relatively highly correlated. Test-retest data on 113 patients showed high reliability for most scales. Scales of the IN-PATSAT32 and of the QLQ-C30 were not significantly correlated, suggesting that the two questionnaires are assessing quite distinct concepts. The scales of the IN-PATSAT32 were able to discriminate clearly between patients with differing care expectations and differing intentions to recommend their hospital to others. This study supports the acceptability to patients, and the psychometric robustness of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire. Further studies are needed to assess the responsiveness of the questionnaire to changes in the structure and process of care over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182120     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  63 in total

1.  Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Karen M Freund; Jack Clark; Julie Darnell; Alan Holden; Douglas Post; Steven R Patierno; Paul C Winters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Validation of EORTC IN-PATSAT32 for Chinese cancer patients.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Zhenbo Dai; Siying Cheng; Shumin Xie; Stephanie Mu-Lian Woo; Zhiqin Luo; Jinglian Wu; Tianwen Gao; Jiahao Liu; Kai Zhang; Jing Zhang; Xinyu Jia; Adam R Miller; Changli Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Evaluation properties of the French version of the OUT-PATSAT35 satisfaction with care questionnaire according to classical and item response theory analyses.

Authors:  M Panouillères; A Anota; T V Nguyen; A Brédart; J F Bosset; A Monnier; M Mercier; J B Hardouin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Paul C Winters; Electra Paskett; Kristen Wells; Tracy Battaglia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Measuring patient satisfaction in oncology palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE-patient scale.

Authors:  Christopher Lo; Debika Burman; Gary Rodin; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Transfer of communication skills to the workplace during clinical rounds: impact of a program for residents.

Authors:  Aurore Liénard; Isabelle Merckaert; Yves Libert; Isabelle Bragard; Nicole Delvaux; Anne-Marie Etienne; Serge Marchal; Julie Meunier; Christine Reynaert; Jean-Louis Slachmuylder; Darius Razavi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A prospective randomized pilot study evaluating an ERAS protocol versus a standard protocol for patients treated with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Karl Frees; Jonathan Aning; Peter Black; Werner Struss; Robert Bell; Claudia Chavez-Munoz; Martin Gleave; Alan I So
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire: EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Validation study for Spanish patients.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Ruth Vera; Maite Martínez; Berta Hernández; Nuria Laínez; Mikel Rico; Meritxell Vila; Volker Chicata; Gemma Asín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care.

Authors:  Mariëlle Ouwens; Rosella Hermens; Marlies Hulscher; Saskia Vonk-Okhuijsen; Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen; René Termeer; Henri Marres; Hub Wollersheim; Richard Grol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E M L Verschuur; E W Steyerberg; H W Tilanus; S Polinder; M-L Essink-Bot; K T C Tran; A van der Gaast; L P S Stassen; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.