Literature DB >> 16182066

Fixation of tendon grafts for collateral ligament reconstructions: a cadaveric biomechanical study.

Steve K Lee1, Erik N Kubiak, Frank A Liporace, Debra M Parisi, Kazuho Iesaka, Martin A Posner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 4 methods of fixation of tendon grafts to bone as used for ligament reconstructions.
METHODS: Thirty-two metacarpals were harvested from fresh-frozen cadavers and stripped of soft tissue. Flexor tendons were harvested from the same cadavers and cut into 2-mm-wide strips. Each tendon was fixed to a metacarpal head at the site of origin of a collateral ligament. Four different methods of fixation were tested. In group 1 the tendon was fixed to the bone with a 4.0-mm Arthrex bio-tenodesis interference screw (Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL). In group 2 the tendon was passed through a bone tunnel and fixed with a 3.2-mm mini-Acutrak screw (Acumed, LLC, Hillsboro, OR) that was inserted in interference mode. In group 3 the tendon was passed through a bone tunnel and fixed with sutures tied over a polyethylene button. In group 4 the tendon was fixed with a mini-Mitek bone suture anchor (Mitek Worldwide, Norwood, MA). All specimens were clamped into a linear loading machine and loaded until failure. Statistical analysis was performed by 1-way analysis of variance testing.
RESULTS: The differences in maximal tensile strength and stiffness were statistically significant when comparing any 2 groups. The Arthrex biotenodesis interference screw was the strongest and stiffest fixation method, followed by the Acutrak screw inserted in interference mode. Next was the suture tied over a button method. The mini-Mitek bone suture anchor was the weakest.
CONCLUSIONS: Interference screw fixation of tendons to bone has statistically significant higher pullout strength and stiffness than 2 other commonly used fixation methods. The use of interference screws for fixation of tendon grafts to bone for hand ligament reconstructions is a promising new surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182066     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  1 in total

1.  Tendon graft--ulna fixation in distal radio-ulnar joint stabilisation; biomechanical comparison of three graft-bone fixation methods.

Authors:  N S Kalson; C P Charalambous; E S Powell; A Hearnden; J K Stanley
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-01-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.