Literature DB >> 16181860

Isolated mitral valve repair in patients with depressed left ventricular function.

Ashish S Shah1, Steven A Hannish, Carmelo A Milano, Donald D Glower.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utility of mitral valve repair (MV repair) has been well documented in patients with normal left ventricular function. Few studies, however, have specifically examined outcomes of isolated MV repair in patients with decreased left ventricular function. The purpose of the present study is to review a modern experience with isolated MV repair in patients with depressed left ventricular function and to examine intermediate outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent MV repair from 1996 to 2003 was performed to identify consecutive patients who had isolated MV repair. Preoperative studies were reviewed to further identify patients with an ejection fraction less than 0.45. Clinical operative data were collected from the medical record, and survival was determined with the Social Security Death Index. Further end points of reoperation and transplantation were also noted.
RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 1,124 days. Mean ejection fraction and age was 0.34 +/- 0.09 and 56 +/- 14 years, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 2.9%. One- and 5-year survival was 94% +/- 2% and 70% +/- 6%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in actuarial survival for functional versus primary mitral disease, or for ejection fraction less than 0.35 versus greater than 0.35. Six patients required transplantation. Five-year freedom from reoperation, transplantation, and death was 61% +/- 11% and 54% +/- 8% for patients with primary and secondary mitral valve disease, respectively (p = 0.279). Minimally invasive MV repair was performed in 57 patients with a mean ejection fraction of 0.369 +/- 0.07 and a 30-day mortality of 1.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated MV regurgitation and depressed left ventricular function, MV repair can be achieved with low operative mortality, but there remains a persistent risk of death, reoperation, or transplantation irrespective of valve disease. Minimally invasive MV repair was safe in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181860     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation: results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study.

Authors:  Joachim Schofer; Tomasz Siminiak; Michael Haude; Jean P Herrman; Jindra Vainer; Justina C Wu; Wayne C Levy; Laura Mauri; Ted Feldman; Raymond Y Kwong; David M Kaye; Stephen J Duffy; Thilo Tübler; Hubertus Degen; Mathias C Brandt; Rich Van Bibber; Steve Goldberg; David G Reuter; Uta C Hoppe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Advances in the surgical treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Larry A Allen; G Michael Felker
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  [Percutaneous mitral valve annuloplasty with the carillon mitral contour system by cardiac dimensions. A minimally invasive therapeutic option for the treatment of severe functional mitral valve regurgitation].

Authors:  Hubertus Degen; Thomas Lickfeld; Carsten Stoepel; Michael Haude
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?

Authors:  Zhibing Qiu; Xin Chen; Ming Xu; Yingshuo Jiang; Liqiong Xiao; LeLe Liu; Liming Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.