BACKGROUND:Selenium is known to be important to the brain. Three small, published studies have suggested an effect of selenium supplementation or deprivation on mood in healthy volunteers. We investigated these findings on a much larger scale. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention, 501 UK participants aged 60-74 were randomly allocated to receive 100, 200 or 300microg selenium/d as high-selenium yeast or placebo yeast. Mood (Profile of Moods States - Bipolar Form [POMS-BI] questionnaire), "quality of life" (Short Form 36 [SF-36] questionnaire) and plasma selenium were measured at baseline and six months. RESULTS: Supplementation significantly increased plasma selenium above baseline values: from an overall mean (SD) of 90(19) ng/g to 91(26), 144(27), 191(41) and 227(53) ng/g in the placebo, 100, 200, 300 microg selenium groups respectively (p < .001). Four hundred forty-eight participants completed the POMS-BI questionnaires at both time points, with no significant differences in total mood or mood-subscale scores seen between doses. After six months of supplementation, mean (SD) total mood scores for the four doses were 163(36), 161(37), 162(33), 162(34), F(3,443) = .25, p = .86. Quality of life was similarly unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that selenium supplementation benefited mood or quality of life in these elderly volunteers. Though this is at odds with some previous results, our robust study design, much larger sample size and longer supplementation period, together with the evidence that the brain is a privileged site for selenium retention, suggest that this is a reliable finding.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Selenium is known to be important to the brain. Three small, published studies have suggested an effect of selenium supplementation or deprivation on mood in healthy volunteers. We investigated these findings on a much larger scale. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention, 501 UK participants aged 60-74 were randomly allocated to receive 100, 200 or 300 microg selenium/d as high-seleniumyeast or placebo yeast. Mood (Profile of Moods States - Bipolar Form [POMS-BI] questionnaire), "quality of life" (Short Form 36 [SF-36] questionnaire) and plasma selenium were measured at baseline and six months. RESULTS: Supplementation significantly increased plasma selenium above baseline values: from an overall mean (SD) of 90(19) ng/g to 91(26), 144(27), 191(41) and 227(53) ng/g in the placebo, 100, 200, 300 microg selenium groups respectively (p < .001). Four hundred forty-eight participants completed the POMS-BI questionnaires at both time points, with no significant differences in total mood or mood-subscale scores seen between doses. After six months of supplementation, mean (SD) total mood scores for the four doses were 163(36), 161(37), 162(33), 162(34), F(3,443) = .25, p = .86. Quality of life was similarly unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that selenium supplementation benefited mood or quality of life in these elderly volunteers. Though this is at odds with some previous results, our robust study design, much larger sample size and longer supplementation period, together with the evidence that the brain is a privileged site for selenium retention, suggest that this is a reliable finding.
Authors: Maia J Benner; Robert E Drew; Ronald W Hardy; Barrie D Robison Journal: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 2.320
Authors: Seif O Shaheen; Roger B Newson; Margaret P Rayman; Angela P-L Wong; Michael K Tumilty; Joanna M Phillips; James F Potts; Frank J Kelly; Patrick T White; Peter G J Burney Journal: Thorax Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Mariska Bot; Ingeborg A Brouwer; Miquel Roca; Elisabeth Kohls; Brenda W J H Penninx; Ed Watkins; Gerard van Grootheest; Mieke Cabout; Ulrich Hegerl; Margalida Gili; Matthew Owens; Marjolein Visser Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maia J Benner; Matt L Settles; Gordon K Murdoch; Ronald W Hardy; Barrie D Robison Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Jennifer Lin; Nancy R Cook; Christine Albert; Elaine Zaharris; J Michael Gaziano; Martin Van Denburgh; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Christian L Ward-Deitrich; Emily Whyte; Christopher Hopley; Margaret P Rayman; Yasumitsu Ogra; Heidi Goenaga-Infante Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 4.142