Literature DB >> 16181604

Shape-from-shading for matte and glossy objects.

Harold T Nefs1, Jan J Koenderink, Astrid M L Kappers.   

Abstract

We wanted to find out whether the presence of specular highlights on the otherwise matte objects would make a difference to the perceived surface relief. Six different, globally convex objects were displayed on a computer screen. The depicted objects were either matte or glossy and were illuminated from one of the two different directions. Shape-from-shading was evaluated with two different paradigms. In Experiment 1 observers were asked to set a number of local surface attitude probes such that the probes looked as if they were tangent to the objects' surfaces. In Experiment 2, observers were instructed to make traces of the contours of the depicted objects in the horizontal and vertical planes. Although the two tasks target different aspects of the perceived surface, they give essentially similar results here. In both tasks we found differences that were induced by changing the illumination direction. Surprisingly, no systematic difference was found between the results for matte and glossy objects. We must, therefore, conclude that there is no evidence from the current study that glossiness influences shape perception although to the observer matte and glossy objects look quite different.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181604     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  12 in total

1.  Estimating changes in lighting direction in binocularly viewed three-dimensional scenes.

Authors:  Holly E Gerhard; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Michael S Landy; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

3.  Learning to use illumination gradients as an unambiguous cue to three dimensional shape.

Authors:  Glen Harding; Julie M Harris; Marina Bloj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Material and shape perception based on two types of intensity gradient information.

Authors:  Masataka Sawayama; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  The perception and misperception of optical defocus, shading, and shape.

Authors:  Scott Wj Mooney; Phillip J Marlow; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The Effect of Material Properties on the Perceived Shape of Three-Dimensional Objects.

Authors:  Masakazu Ohara; Juno Kim; Kowa Koida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-12-26

7.  The Role of Specular Reflections and Illumination in the Perception of Thickness in Solid Transparent Objects.

Authors:  Masakazu Ohara; Juno Kim; Kowa Koida
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Enhancement of glossiness perception by retinal-image motion: additional effect of head-yoked motion parallax.

Authors:  Yusuke Tani; Keisuke Araki; Takehiro Nagai; Kowa Koida; Shigeki Nakauchi; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The extraction of 3D shape from texture and shading in the human brain.

Authors:  Svetlana S Georgieva; James T Todd; Ronald Peeters; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Effects of specular highlights on perceived surface convexity.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; James H Elder
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.