Literature DB >> 1618158

Evidence of a role for endogenous electrical fields in chick embryo development.

K B Hotary1, K R Robinson.   

Abstract

We have tested directly the hypothesis that the endogenous electrical field in the chick embryo plays a causal role in development. Conductive implants, which shunt currents out of the embryo and thus alter the internal field, were placed under the dorsal skin at the mid-trunk level of stage 11-15 embryos. Currents leaving the posterior intestinal portal (p.i.p.) of these embryos were reduced by an average of 30%. Control embryos receiving non-conductive implants showed no change in p.i.p. currents. In the group receiving current shunts, 92% of the embryos exhibited some developmental abnormality. Only 11% of the control group displayed defects. The most common defect in the experimental group (81%) was in tail development. Tail defects ranged from complete absence to the formation of a normal length, but morphologically abnormal tail. Internally, tail structures (neural tube, notochord and somites) were frequently absent or aberrantly formed. In 33% of the experimental embryos, the notochord continued lengthening in the absence of any other tail development. This led to the formation of ourenteric outgrowths from the hindgut. Defects in limb bud and head development were also found in experimentally treated embryos, but at a much lower frequency than tail defects. The abnormalities observed in experimental embryos were very similar to those produced naturally in rumpless mutant chicks. A vibrating probe analysis of these mutants (from both dominant and recessive strains) showed that currents leaving the p.i.p. were significantly lower in phenotypically abnormal mutants than in wild-type and phenotypically normal mutant embryos from both strains. There was no apparent correlation between the average transepithelial potential (TEP) of these mutants and the development of tail abnormalities. The possible role of endogenous electrical fields in chick tail development is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618158     DOI: 10.1242/dev.114.4.985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  41 in total

1.  The influence of electric fields on hippocampal neural progenitor cells.

Authors:  Carlos Atico Ariza; Asha T Fleury; Christian J Tormos; Vadim Petruk; Sagar Chawla; Jisun Oh; Donald S Sakaguchi; Surya K Mallapragada
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Iatrogenic environmental hazards in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Thomas T Lai; Cynthia F Bearer
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 3.  Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Levin
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Alternating current electric fields of varying frequencies: effects on proliferation and differentiation of porcine neural progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ji-Hey Lim; Seth D McCullen; Jorge A Piedrahita; Elizabeth G Loboa; Natasha J Olby
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic landscape of positional memory in the caudal fin of zebrafish.

Authors:  Jeremy S Rabinowitz; Aaron M Robitaille; Yuliang Wang; Catherine A Ray; Ryan Thummel; Haiwei Gu; Danijel Djukovic; Daniel Raftery; Jason D Berndt; Randall T Moon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Coupling of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) therapy to molecular grounds of the cell.

Authors:  Richard Hw Funk
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 7.  Endogenous bioelectrical networks store non-genetic patterning information during development and regeneration.

Authors:  Michael Levin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  The Role of Direct Current Electric Field-Guided Stem Cell Migration in Neural Regeneration.

Authors:  Li Yao; Yongchao Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 9.  Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: Mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form.

Authors:  Kelly A McLaughlin; Michael Levin
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Huai Bai; Entong Wang; John V Forrester; Colin D McCaig
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.