Literature DB >> 16181444

Frontal brain asymmetry and reward responsiveness: a source-localization study.

Diego A Pizzagalli1, Rebecca J Sherwood, Jeffrey B Henriques, Richard J Davidson.   

Abstract

The influence of approach and avoidance tendencies on affect, reasoning, and behavior has attracted substantial interest from researchers across various areas of psychology. Currently, frontal electroencephalographic (EEG) asymmetry in favor of left prefrontal regions is assumed to reflect the propensity to respond with approach-related tendencies. To test this hypothesis, we recorded resting EEG in 18 subjects, who separately performed a verbal memory task under three incentive conditions (neutral, reward, and punishment). Using a source-localization technique, we found that higher task-independent alpha2 (10.5-12 Hz) activity within left dorsolateral prefrontal and medial orbitofrontal regions was associated with stronger bias to respond to reward-related cues. Left prefrontal resting activity accounted for 54.8% of the variance in reward bias. These findings not only confirm that frontal EEG asymmetry modulates the propensity to engage in appetitively motivated behavior, but also provide anatomical details about the underlying brain systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181444     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01618.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  100 in total

1.  Prefrontal Cortex, Emotion, and Approach/Withdrawal Motivation.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spielberg; Jennifer L Stewart; Rebecca L Levin; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Elevated left mid-frontal cortical activity prospectively predicts conversion to bipolar I disorder.

Authors:  Robin Nusslock; Eddie Harmon-Jones; Lauren B Alloy; Snezana Urosevic; Kim Goldstein; Lyn Y Abramson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-07-09

3.  Event-related frontal alpha asymmetries: electrophysiological correlates of approach motivation.

Authors:  Benjamin Schöne; Jessica Schomberg; Thomas Gruber; Markus Quirin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Social status determines how we monitor and evaluate our performance.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Evelien Kostermans; Branka Milivojevic; David De Cremer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Social power and approach-related neural activity.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Ruud Smolders; David De Cremer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Behavioral approach system sensitivity and risk taking interact to predict left-frontal EEG asymmetry.

Authors:  Chelsea L Black; Kim E Goldstein; Denise R LaBelle; Christopher W Brown; Eddie Harmon-Jones; Lyn Y Abramson; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2014-01-30

7.  Brain structural substrates of reward dependence during behavioral performance.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Janne M Hamann; Bruno B Averbeck; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Supervisory control system and frontal asymmetry: neurophysiological traits of emotion-based impulsivity.

Authors:  Philip A Gable; Nicole C Mechin; Joshua A Hicks; David L Adams
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Neural activity and diurnal variation of cortisol: evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis and relevance to anhedonia.

Authors:  Katherine M Putnam; Diego A Pizzagalli; Diane C Gooding; Ned H Kalin; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Effects of stressor controllability on psychophysiological, cognitive and behavioural responses in patients with major depression and dysthymia.

Authors:  C Diener; C Kuehner; W Brusniak; M Struve; H Flor
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.