Literature DB >> 16181168

Universal bone densitometry screening combined with alendronate therapy for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for elderly women.

John T Schousboe1, Kristine E Ensrud, John A Nyman, L Joseph Melton, Robert L Kane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of universal bone densitometry in women aged 65 and older combined with alendronate treatment for those diagnosed with osteoporosis (femoral neck T-score < or = -2.5).
DESIGN: A Markov model with a lifetime time horizon and eight health states (no fracture, distal forearm fracture, radiographic (but clinically inapparent) vertebral fracture, clinical vertebral fracture, hip fracture, hip and vertebral fracture, and other fractures), using the societal perspective.
SETTING: Women living independently and those in nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Caucasian women aged 65, 75, 85, or 95. INTERVENTION: Bone densitometry of the hip, with 5 years of alendronate therapy for those found to have osteoporosis versus no intervention (densitometry or drug therapy). MEASUREMENTS: Lifetime accumulated quality adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
RESULTS: The cost per QALY gained for the screen-and-treat strategy was 43,000 dollars per QALY gained for 65-year-old women and 5,600 dollars per QALY gained for 75-year-old women. For 85- and 95-year-old women, the screen-and-treat strategy was cost saving. Sensitivity analyses showed that the screen-and-treat strategy was cost-effective even under assumptions of reduced adherence to drug therapy, reduced fracture reduction benefit from alendronate therapy, or reduced QALYs saved by preventing fracture.
CONCLUSION: Universal bone densitometry combined with alendronate therapy for those found to have osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for women aged 65 and older and may be cost saving for ambulatory women aged 85 and older (whether independently living or residing in nursing homes).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181168     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  28 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Does the funding source influence the results in economic evaluations? A case study in bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; D Eldon Spackman; Christopher Hollenbeak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Bisphosphonate treatment and risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  K Sun; J M Liu; H X Sun; N Lu; G Ning
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry among Caucasian women and men without a prior fracture according to age and body weight.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; M Gourlay; H A Fink; B C Taylor; E S Orwoll; E Barrett-Connor; L J Melton; S R Cummings; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Using Biomechanical Computed Tomography for Patients With a Previous Abdominal CT.

Authors:  Maria Pisu; David L Kopperdahl; Cora E Lewis; Kenneth G Saag; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Is osteoporosis disease management cost effective?

Authors:  Richard Dell; Denise Greene
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; A N A Tosteson; L J Melton; S Baim; M J Favus; S Khosla; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective.

Authors:  A N A Tosteson; L J Melton; B Dawson-Hughes; S Baim; M J Favus; S Khosla; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention.

Authors:  Gustavo Duque; Stephen R Lord; Jenson Mak; Kirtan Ganda; Jacqueline J T Close; Peter Ebeling; Alexandra Papaioannou; Charles A Inderjeeth
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in the older senior.

Authors:  Sheryl F Vondracek; Sunny A Linnebur
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.