Literature DB >> 16181043

Postal workers' perspectives on communication during the anthrax attack.

Sandra Crouse Quinn1, Tammy Thomas, Carol McAllister.   

Abstract

In 2001, the nation experienced its first bioterrorism attack, in the form of anthrax sent through the U.S. Postal Service, and public health professionals were challenged to communicate with a critical audience, U.S. postal workers. Postal workers, the first cohort to receive public health messages during a bioterrorist crisis, offer a crucial viewpoint that can be used in the development of best practices in crisis and emergency risk communication. This article reports results of qualitative interviews and focus groups with 65 postal workers employed at three facilities: Trenton, New Jersey; New York City; and Washington, DC. The social context and changing messages were among the factors that damaged trust between postal workers and public health professionals. Lessons learned from this attack contribute to the growing body of knowledge available to guide communications experts and public health professionals charged with crisis and emergency risk communication with the public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181043     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  10 in total

1.  Hurricane Katrina: a social and public health disaster.

Authors:  Sandra Crouse Quinn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The anthrax vaccine and research: reactions from postal workers and public health professionals.

Authors:  Sandra Crouse Quinn; Tammy Thomas; Supriya Kumar
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2008-12

3.  Predicting response to reassurances and uncertainties in bioterrorism communications for urban populations in New York and California.

Authors:  Elaine Vaughan; Tim L Tinker; Benedict I Truman; Paul Edelson; Stephen S Morse
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2012-05-14

4.  Health-care provider preferences for time-sensitive communications from public health agencies.

Authors:  Debra Revere; Ian Painter; Mark Oberle; Janet G Baseman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Exposure to bioterrorism and mental health response among staff on Capitol Hill.

Authors:  Carol S North; Betty Pfefferbaum; Meena Vythilingam; Gregory J Martin; John K Schorr; Angela S Boudreaux; Edward L Spitznagel; Barry A Hong
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2009-12

6.  Comparing electronic news media reports of potential bioterrorism-related incidents involving unknown white powder to reports received by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Federal Bureau of Investigation: U.S.A., 2009-2011.

Authors:  Geroncio C Fajardo; Joseph Posid; Stephen Papagiotas; Luis Lowe
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 1.832

7.  Public willingness to take a vaccine or drug under Emergency Use Authorization during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Authors:  Sandra Crouse Quinn; Supriya Kumar; Vicki S Freimuth; Kelley Kidwell; Donald Musa
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2009-09

8.  Disaster impact across cultural groups: comparison of Whites, African Americans, and Latinos.

Authors:  Tatiana M Davidson; Matthew Price; Jenna L McCauley; Kenneth J Ruggiero
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2013-09

9.  Mass Casualty Decontamination Guidance and Psychosocial Aspects of CBRN Incident Management: A Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Holly Carter; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Public perceptions of hospital responsibilities to those presenting without medical injury or illness during a disaster.

Authors:  Rachel L Charney; Terri Rebmann; Cybill R Esguerra; Charlene W Lai; Preeti Dalawari
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 1.484

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.