Literature DB >> 16180414

Hygienization by anaerobic digestion: comparison between evaluation by cultivation and quantitative real-time PCR.

M Lebuhn1, M Effenberger, G Garcés, A Gronauer, P A Wilderer.   

Abstract

In order to assess hygienization by anaerobic digestion, a comparison between evaluation by cultivation and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) including optimized DNA extraction and quantification was carried out for samples from a full-scale fermenter cascade (F1, mesophilic; F2, thermophilic; F3, mesophilic). The system was highly effective in inactivating (pathogenic) viable microorganisms, except for spore-formers. Conventionally performed cultivation underestimated viable organisms particularly in F2 and F3 by a factor of at least 10 as shown by data from extended incubation times, probably due to the rise of sublethally injured (active but not cultivable) cells. Incubation should hence be extended adequately in incubation-based hygiene monitoring of stressed samples, in order to minimize contamination risks. Although results from qPCR and cultivation agreed for the equilibrated compartments, considerably higher qPCR values were obtained for the fermenters. The difference probably corresponded to DNA copies from decayed cells that had not yet been degraded by the residual microbial activity. An extrapolation from qPCR determination to the quantity of viable organisms is hence not justified for samples that had been exposed to lethal stress.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16180414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  6 in total

1.  A perspective on the prevalence of DNA enteric virus genomes in anaerobic-digested biological wastes.

Authors:  Kelvin Wong; Irene Xagoraraki
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Diversity and abundance of zoonotic pathogens and indicators in manures of feedlot cattle in Australia.

Authors:  Marcus Klein; Leearna Brown; Robyn W Tucker; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Richard M Stuetz; David J Roser
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Detection of pathogenic clostridia in biogas plant wastes.

Authors:  Jürgen Neuhaus; Awad A Shehata; Monika Krüger
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Stress- and growth rate-related differences between plate count and real-time PCR data during growth of Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Franziska Reichert-Schwillinsky; Carmen Pin; Monika Dzieciol; Martin Wagner; Ingeborg Hein
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Removal of Fecal Indicators, Pathogenic Bacteria, Adenovirus, Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in Waste Stabilization Ponds in Northern and Eastern Australia.

Authors:  Maxim Sheludchenko; Anna Padovan; Mohammad Katouli; Helen Stratton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Persistence and Potential Viable but Non-culturable State of Pathogenic Bacteria during Storage of Digestates from Agricultural Biogas Plants.

Authors:  Geraldine Maynaud; Anne-Marie Pourcher; Christine Ziebal; Anais Cuny; Céline Druilhe; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Nathalie Wéry
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.