Literature DB >> 16179950

The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis.

Manuel Théry1, Victor Racine, Anne Pépin, Matthieu Piel, Yong Chen, Jean-Baptiste Sibarita, Michel Bornens.   

Abstract

The cell division axis determines the future positions of daughter cells and is therefore critical for cell fate. The positioning of the division axis has been mostly studied in systems such as embryos or yeasts, in which cell shape is well defined. In these cases, cell shape anisotropy and cell polarity affect spindle orientation. It remains unclear whether cell geometry or cortical cues are determinants for spindle orientation in mammalian cultured cells. The cell environment is composed of an extracellular matrix (ECM), which is connected to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton via transmembrane proteins. We used micro-contact printing to control the spatial distribution of the ECM on the substrate and demonstrated that it has a role in determining the orientation of the division axis of HeLa cells. On the basis of our analysis of the average distributions of actin-binding proteins in interphase and mitosis, we propose that the ECM controls the location of actin dynamics at the membrane, and thus the segregation of cortical components in interphase. This segregation is further maintained on the cortex of mitotic cells and used for spindle orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16179950     DOI: 10.1038/ncb1307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  277 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping.

Authors:  Daniel R Gossett; Henry T K Tse; Serena A Lee; Yong Ying; Anne G Lindgren; Otto O Yang; Jianyu Rao; Amander T Clark; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Let's huddle to prevent a muddle: centrosome declustering as an attractive anticancer strategy.

Authors:  A Ogden; P C G Rida; R Aneja
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 3.  Microfabricated substrates as a tool to study cell mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Jimmy le Digabel; Marion Ghibaudo; Léa Trichet; Alain Richert; Benoit Ladoux
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Mechanical control of tissue and organ development.

Authors:  Tadanori Mammoto; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  The numbers behind morphogenesis.

Authors:  Ben-Zion Shilo
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Daniel A Fletcher; R Dyche Mullins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells Sense Three Dimensional Type I Collagen through Discoidin Domain Receptor 1.

Authors:  A W Lund; J P Stegemann; G E Plopper
Journal:  Open Stem Cell J       Date:  2009

8.  Dynamics of podosome stiffness revealed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Anna Labernadie; Christophe Thibault; Christophe Vieu; Isabelle Maridonneau-Parini; Guillaume M Charrière
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interplay of RhoA and motility in the programmed spreading of daughter cells postmitosis.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Denis Wirtz; Peter C Searson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Substrates with patterned extracellular matrix and subcellular stiffness gradients reveal local biomechanical responses.

Authors:  Peter Tseng; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.