Literature DB >> 16179873

A two-cohort phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

Alexander Schmittel1, Ronny Schuster, Nikolaos E Bechrakis, Jan M Siehl, Michael H Foerster, Eckhard Thiel, Ulrich Keilholz.   

Abstract

In-vitro synergy of treosulfan and gemcitabine has been observed in chemotherapy-resistant tumours. This trial investigated the efficacy of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in metastatic uveal melanoma. Patients received 1000 mg/m of gemcitabine and treosulfan at a dose of 2500 or 3000 mg/m2 in cohort 1 and 3500 or 4000 mg/m2 in cohort 2. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. Thirty-three patients were treated, 14 in cohort 1 and 19 in cohort 2. In cohort 1 with a treosulfan dose of <or=3000 mg/m2, no objective response was observed, four patients had stable disease and ten progressed. Of the patients treated with >or=3500 mg/m2 in cohort 2, one had partial remission (5%), 10 showed disease stabilization and eight progressed. An increased survival was observed in the second cohort with higher treosulfan doses, with median survival times of 6.0 versus 9.0 months (P=0.03) in cohort 1 and 2, respectively, and a 1-year survival of 7.1% versus 47.3%, respectively. Based on the observation of prolonged disease stabilization, we recommend further investigation of the gemcitabine/treosulfan combination with a dose of 3500 mg/m2 of treosulfan in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16179873     DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200510000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  7 in total

1.  Lysosomal delivery of a lipophilic gemcitabine prodrug using novel acid-sensitive micelles improved its antitumor activity.

Authors:  Saijie Zhu; Dharmika S P Lansakara-P; Xinran Li; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.774

2.  Preliminary experience with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in liver metastases of uveal malignant melanoma: local tumor control and survival.

Authors:  Thomas Vogl; Katrin Eichler; Stephan Zangos; Christopher Herzog; Renate Hammerstingl; Jörn Balzer; Ali Gholami
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Management of uveal melanoma: a consensus-based provincial clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  E Weis; T G Salopek; J G McKinnon; M P Larocque; C Temple-Oberle; T Cheng; J McWhae; R Sloboda; M Shea-Budgell
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Double-blinded, randomized phase II study using embolization with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in uveal melanoma with hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Matias E Valsecchi; Mizue Terai; David J Eschelman; Carin F Gonsalves; Inna Chervoneva; Jerry A Shields; Carol L Shields; Akira Yamamoto; Kevin L Sullivan; MaryAnn Laudadio; David Berd; Michael J Mastrangelo; Takami Sato
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Quality of evidence about effectiveness of treatments for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  James J Augsburger; Zélia M Corrêa; Adeel H Shaikh
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

6.  Combined treatment of uveal melanoma liver metastases.

Authors:  Birute Brasiuniene; V Sokolovas; V Brasiunas; A Barakauskiene; K Strupas
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elina S Rantala; Micaela Hernberg; Tero T Kivelä
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.