Literature DB >> 16179169

MR imaging of patients with localisation-related seizures: initial experience at 3.0T and relevance to the NICE guidelines.

P D Griffiths1, S C Coley, D J A Connolly, T Hodgson, C A J Romanowski, E Widjaja, G Darwent, I D Wilkinson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe our initial experience of imaging adults with localisation-related epilepsy using MR imaging at 3.0T. We discuss the findings in the context of the recently released NICE guidelines that provide detailed advice on imaging people with epilepsy in the UK. 120 consecutive people over the age of 16 years with localisation-related epilepsy were referred for clinical MR examinations from a regional neuroscience centre in England. None of the people had had MR examinations prior to the present study. High resolution MR imaging was performed taking advantage of the high field strength and high performance gradients of the system. Two experienced neuroradiologists reported on the examinations independently and the presence and type of pathology was recorded. There was complete agreement between the two reporters in all 120 cases. The overall frequency of abnormalities shown by MR was 31/120 (26%) and the commonest abnormality shown was mesial temporal sclerosis found in 10/120 (8%). Tumours were shown in 4/120, all of which appeared low grade as judged by imaging criteria. Epilepsy is the commonest neurological condition and demands a significant resource in order to provide good care for sufferers. Recent guidelines published in the UK have suggested that the majority of people with epilepsy should receive brain MR as part of their routine assessment. Our work shows that using the most sophisticated MR imaging in a highly selected population there is a modest pick-up rate of brain abnormalities. If a widespread epilepsy-imaging programme is started the detection rate is likely to be much lower. Although MR is acknowledged to be a reliable way of detecting pathology in people with epilepsy there is a dearth of information studying the health economics of imaging epilepsy in relation to patient management and outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16179169     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  MR imaging and epilepsy--3T or not 3T? That is the question.

Authors:  Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  Structural magnetic resonance imaging in epilepsy.

Authors:  Karel Deblaere; Eric Achten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  3.0 T MRI of 2000 consecutive patients with localisation-related epilepsy.

Authors:  I J Craven; P D Griffiths; D Bhattacharyya; R A Grunewald; T Hodgson; D J A Connolly; S C Coley; R Batty; C A J Romanowski; N Hoggard
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  High-resolution Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Authors:  Vivek Yedavalli; Phillip DiGiacomo; Elizabeth Tong; Michael Zeineh
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours.

Authors:  Robin Grant; Therese Dowswell; Eve Tomlinson; Paul M Brennan; Fiona M Walter; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; David William Hunt; Helen Bulbeck; Ashleigh Kernohan; Tomos Robinson; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.