BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that some of the variability in reporting of associations between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and candidate genes may result from mixing of genetically heterogeneous forms of ADHD using DSM-IV criteria. The goal of the current study is to test whether population-based ADHD subtypes defined by latent class analysis help resolve issues of variable findings across individual gene association studies. METHODS: Three studies which had previously reported no associations between polymorphisms of the DRD4 and DAT genes and DSM-IV defined ADHD were reanalyzed using population-based and DSM-IV defined ADHD subtypes. RESULTS: Across studies no significant associations were found for either DRD4 or DAT polymorphisms using DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. In contrast, a significant association was found between the combined data set for the 440 base pair 3' DAT VNTR polymorphism and population-defined severe combined ADHD (OR=1.25, p=.01). A marginally significant association was also found between the 7 repeat DRD4 allele and population-defined severe combined ADHD. CONCLUSION: Use of alternative population-based defined ADHD subtypes may help resolve some of the variable results presented for candidate gene association studies in ADHD.
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that some of the variability in reporting of associations between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and candidate genes may result from mixing of genetically heterogeneous forms of ADHD using DSM-IV criteria. The goal of the current study is to test whether population-based ADHD subtypes defined by latent class analysis help resolve issues of variable findings across individual gene association studies. METHODS: Three studies which had previously reported no associations between polymorphisms of the DRD4 and DAT genes and DSM-IV defined ADHD were reanalyzed using population-based and DSM-IV defined ADHD subtypes. RESULTS: Across studies no significant associations were found for either DRD4 or DAT polymorphisms using DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. In contrast, a significant association was found between the combined data set for the 440 base pair 3' DAT VNTR polymorphism and population-defined severe combined ADHD (OR=1.25, p=.01). A marginally significant association was also found between the 7 repeat DRD4 allele and population-defined severe combined ADHD. CONCLUSION: Use of alternative population-based defined ADHD subtypes may help resolve some of the variable results presented for candidate gene association studies in ADHD.
Authors: Maria T Acosta; F Xavier Castellanos; Kelly L Bolton; Joan Z Balog; Patricia Eagen; Linda Nee; Janet Jones; Luis Palacio; Christopher Sarampote; Heather F Russell; Kate Berg; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Maximilian Muenke Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Peter P Zandi; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Anne B Arnett; Brianna E Cairney; Arianne S Wallace; Jennifer Gerdts; Tychele N Turner; Evan E Eichler; Raphael A Bernier Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Erik G Willcutt; Bruce F Pennington; Laramie Duncan; Shelley D Smith; Janice M Keenan; Sally Wadsworth; John C Defries; Richard K Olson Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Josephine Elia; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Kelly L Bolton; Paul J Ambrosini; Wade Berrettini; Maximilian Muenke Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-11-08 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Bernard F Fuemmeler; Tanya D Agurs-Collins; F Joseph McClernon; Scott H Kollins; Melanie E Kail; Andrew W Bergen; Allison E Ashley-Koch Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.002