Literature DB >> 16178480

Procalcitonin levels in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Sylvie Opatrná1, Jan Klaboch, Karel Opatrný, Lubos Holubec, Martina Tomsů, Frantisek Sefrna, Ondrej Topolcan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the levels of procalcitonin (PCT), a new marker of infection and/or inflammation, differ between peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and healthy volunteers, and whether PCT is detectable in uninfected drained dialysate.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
SETTING: PD unit, department of medicine, in a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 28 PD patients, free of systemic infection, and 28 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers.
METHODS: PCT was determined by immunoluminometry; detection range 0.01 - 500 ng/mL, reference range < 0.5 ng/mL.
RESULTS: Plasma levels of PCT were significantly higher (Wilcoxon's paired test, p < 0.001) in PD patients (median 0.33 ng/mL) compared with healthy volunteers (0.18 ng/mL). Spearman's test demonstrated a significant positive correlation between PCT and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0.59, p < 0.01); correlations between PCT and transferrin, total weekly creatinine clearance (ClCr), and the renal components of ClCr and Kt/V urea were negative. PCT levels in dialysate (PCTd) were 0.07 ng/mL and correlated positively with plasma PCT, serum CRP, and dialysate fibrinogen levels. The dialysate-to-plasma ratio (D/P) of PCT was 0.2. Neither PCTd nor D/P PCT correlated with D/P creatinine at 4-hours of dwell.
CONCLUSION: Compared with healthy volunteers, PD patients without overt signs of infection showed increased plasma PCT levels. Given the study design, it is impossible to determine to what extent the increase in plasma PCT is due to reduced elimination and to what extent it reflects the microinflammation of uremia. Based on the D/P PCT gradient, we assume that PCT transport is more likely to occur from the systemic circulation to the peritoneal cavity than vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16178480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  5 in total

Review 1.  Procalcitonin: present and future.

Authors:  H H Liu; J B Guo; Y Geng; L Su
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Predictive value of procalcitonin for diagnosis of infections in patients with chronic kidney disease: a comparison with traditional inflammatory markers C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and neutrophil percentage.

Authors:  Yanbei Sun; Lijuan Jiang; Xiaonan Shao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Significance of serum procalcitonin as biomarker for detection of bacterial peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-kun Yang; Li Xiao; Hao Zhang; Xiao-xuan Xu; Pan-ai Song; Fu-you Liu; Lin Sun
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Clinical relevance of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as infection markers in renal impairment: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Park; Do Hee Kim; Hye Ryoun Jang; Min-Ji Kim; Sin-Ho Jung; Jung Eun Lee; Wooseong Huh; Yoon-Goo Kim; Dae Joong Kim; Ha Young Oh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Impact of hepatic function on serum procalcitonin for the diagnosis of bacterial infections in patients with chronic liver disease: A retrospective analysis of 324 cases.

Authors:  Junyan Qu; Ping Feng; Yan Luo; Xiaoju Lü
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.