Literature DB >> 16178160

The binocular combination of chromatic contrast.

David R Simmons1.   

Abstract

How is chromatic contrast combined binocularly? One index of binocularity is the binocular contrast summation ratio (BCSR), which is the improvement in contrast sensitivity with binocular rather than monocular presentation. Simmons and Kingdom (1998, Vision Research 38 1063-1071) noted that BCSRs with some red-green isoluminant stimuli were suggestive of full linear summation. This suggestion was investigated further in four subjects by measuring binocular and monocular contrast thresholds for the detection of 0.5 cycle deg(1) isoluminant (red-green) and isochromatic (yellow-black) Gabor patches. These Gabor patches had either vertically or horizontally oriented carrier gratings and were either dichoptically in phase (same coloured bars in binocular correspondence) or in dichoptic anti-phase (opposite coloured bars in binocular correspondence). Full linear summation would be indicated by BCSRs of 2 for the in-phase and close to 0 for the anti-phase conditions. Mean BCSRs at isoluminance were 1.93 and 0.90, respectively, for the in-phase and anti-phase stimuli with horizontal carriers, the former being consistent with full linear summation, but the latter not. Despite these results, BCSRs obtained with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli under similar conditions were not statistically distinguishable from each other, although there was a tendency for summation at isoluminance with in-phase stimuli to be higher and anti-phase stimuli to be lower. These data fall short of demonstrating full linear summation of chromatic contrast between the eyes under all presentation conditions, but they do indicate that there are strong binocular interactions at red-green isoluminance, which are similar to, and possibly even stronger than, those obtained with luminance stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16178160     DOI: 10.1068/p5279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Deficient binocular combination reveals mechanisms of anisometropic amblyopia: signal attenuation and interocular inhibition.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Contrast and phase combination in binocular vision.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Stuart A Wallis; Mark A Georgeson; Tim S Meese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing binocular interaction in amblyopia and its clinical feasibility.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Alexandra Miller; Melanie Kazlas; David G Hunter; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Binocular combination of second-order stimuli.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhou; Rong Liu; Yifeng Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Orientation tuning of binocular summation: a comparison of colour to achromatic contrast.

Authors:  Mina Gheiratmand; Avital S Cherniawsky; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Spatial-frequency dependent binocular imbalance in amblyopia.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Emily Wiecek; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.