Literature DB >> 16178131

Comparative clinical trial of two antigingivitis mouthrinses.

Jon J Witt1, Patricia Walters, Samer Bsoul, Roger Gibb, John Dunavent, Mark Putt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and the antiplaque and antigingivitis efficacy of two oral rinses.
METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel groups, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a high bioavailable, alcohol-free 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) rinse (Crest Pro-Health Rinse) and a positive control rinse containing essential oils (EO) and 21.6% ethyl alcohol (Cool Mint Listerine). Seventy-eight healthy adults were enrolled in a modified experimental gingivitis clinical trial. Four weeks before the baseline visit, subjects received a prophylaxis and were instructed to brush twice daily in a manner to approach optimum gingival health. At the end of the 4-week period, subjects were randomly assigned to treatment and instructed to use 20 ml of their assigned product for 30 seconds after brushing twice daily during a 21-day treatment phase. Plaque removal by brushing was prevented during the treatment phase for one mandibular quadrant (experimental gingivitis region) by means of a specially-manufactured tooth shield. Safety and efficacy measurements were obtained at baseline and at the end-of-treatment using the Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (MQH). At all visits, an oral soft tissue examination was performed for each subject. The efficacy data obtained in the experimental gingivitis region were analyzed with analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: Seventy-five subjects completed the study and were included in the data analyses. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two treatment groups for MGI, GBI or MQH measures. Results were similar for shielded interproximal sites. Both treatments were well-tolerated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This randomized, controlled comparative clinical trial demonstrated that rinsing twice daily with the experimental alcohol-free 0.07% CPC rinse provides antiplaque and antigingivitis efficacy similar to that of the positive control EO rinse, a recognized antiplaque and antigingivitis mouthrinse that contains alcohol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16178131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  5 in total

1.  The effects of three different mouth rinses in a 4-day supragingival plaque regrowth study.

Authors:  Feyza Ulkur; Tulin Arun; Fulya Ozdemir
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

2.  Comparative antiplaque and antigingivitis effectiveness of tea tree oil mouthwash and a cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash: A randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Betul Rahman; Sausan Alkawas; Elaf A Al Zubaidi; Omar I Adel; Nuha Hawas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

Review 3.  Adverse events associated with home use of mouthrinses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca M Tartaglia; Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Chiarella Sforza; Conchita Martín
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09-23

Review 4.  Recent Development of Active Ingredients in Mouthwashes and Toothpastes for Periodontal Diseases.

Authors:  Meenakshi Rajendiran; Harsh M Trivedi; Dandan Chen; Praveen Gajendrareddy; Lin Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  The use of mouthwash containing essential oils (LISTERINE®) to improve oral health: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fahad Ali Alshehri
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.