Literature DB >> 16178043

Differences in antihypertensive drug persistence associated with drug class and gender: a PHARMO study.

Joëlle A Erkens1, Martien M J Panneman, Olaf H Klungel, Guido van den Boom, Margaret F Prescott, Ron M C Herings.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to investigate factors related to treatment persistence among users of antihypertensive (AHT) drugs in daily practice.
METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from the PHARMO database including pharmacy records and hospitalizations in the Netherlands (n=950,000). Patients who newly received AHT therapy (n=17,113) between 1997 and 2001 were selected. Of these patients, random samples of 500 patients per drug class were drawn. One-year persistence was defined as (1) the percentage of patients using AHTs at least 270 days and receiving AHT in 3 months after the 1-year follow-up period, and (2) Catalan method (Kaplan-Meier curves). Gender specific persistence rates per drug class were adjusted for significant factors including age, use of antidiabetics and lipid lowering drugs, and prior cardiovascular hospitalizations (OR and 95%CI).
RESULTS: Persistence was highest in users of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (62.0%), progressively lower in users of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-inhibitors, 59.7%), betablockers (35.0%), calcium channel blockers (34.7%), and diuretics (33.0%), resulting in the highest OR of 3.4 [95%CI: 2.6-4.5] for ARBs compared to diuretics. The persistence of AHT use in women was substantially lower (40.1% vs. 50.2%, OR 0.7 [95%CI: 0.6-0.8]) and differences between drug classes were larger than in men.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate marked differences in persistence between AHT classes, with the highest persistence for ARBs and lowest for diuretics. Women were less persistent with their AHT compared to men. This low persistence leads to suboptimal treatment with a potential for substantial clinical consequences. Especially in women, more attention paid to AHT persistence patterns could improve their cardiovascular outcome. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16178043     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  28 in total

Review 1.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Gender Differences in Antihypertensive Treatment: Myths or Legends?

Authors:  Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Massimo Salvetti; Claudia Agabiti Rosei; Anna Paini
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2016-04-22

3.  Choice of initial antihypertensive drugs and persistence of drug use--a 4-year follow-up of 78,453 incident users.

Authors:  Randi Selmer; Hege Salvesen Blix; Knud Landmark; Asmund Reikvam
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  [Female patients with arterial hypertension].

Authors:  A Mitchell; T Philipp
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Rupert A Payne
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  A multicenter retrospective experience of infliximab in Crohn's disease patients: infusion reaction rates and treatment persistency.

Authors:  Ali Keshavarzian; Lloyd Mayer; Bruce Salzberg; Michael Garone; Warren Finkelstein; Joseph Cappa; Myron Brand; Jon Hain; David Zelinger; Ronald Hegedus; Robert H Diamond; Ulka Campbell; Christi Lane; Paul Stang; John Watson; Fabio Cominelli
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-05

7.  Clinical impact of patient adherence to a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Peter Bramlage; Reinhard Ketelhut; Eva-Maria Fronk; Wolf-Peter Wolf; Rüdiger Smolnik; Claudia Zemmrich; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Trends in Prescription and Determinants of Persistence to Antihypertensive Therapy : The PAPEETE Study.

Authors:  Francesco Vittorio Costa; Luca Degli Esposti; Carlo Cerra; Chiara Veronesi; Stefano Buda
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-03

9.  Persistence with antihypertensive treatments: results of a 3-year follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  Joerg Hasford; Detlef Schröder-Bernhardi; Marietta Rottenkolber; Karel Kostev; Gerhard Dietlein
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Standardizing terminology and definitions of medication adherence and persistence in research employing electronic databases.

Authors:  Marsha A Raebel; Julie Schmittdiel; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer L Konieczny; John F Steiner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.