Literature DB >> 16178007

Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig.

Ryan D Katz1, Gedge D Rosson, Jesse A Taylor, Navin K Singh.   

Abstract

We present the concept that a surgical robot may be used to successfully perform a free flap. To study different microsurgical techniques, a porcine free flap model was developed in our laboratory. Dissection of the free flap model and isolation of the vessels were completed under traditional loupe magnification. The da Vinci robot was then used to perform vessel adventitiectomy and microanastomoses. The model was observed for 4 h postoperatively, noting flap color, temperature, capillary refill, and Doppler signal. At the end of this period, the flap was noted to be viable; anastomoses were evaluated and found to be grossly and microscopically patent. Advantages conferred by the da Vinci robot include elimination of tremor, scalable movements, fully articulating instruments with six degrees of spatial freedom, and a dynamic three-dimensional visualization system. Drawbacks include the cost and the absence of true microsurgical instruments. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16178007     DOI: 10.1002/micr.20160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  13 in total

1.  Robotic Approaches to Palatoplasty and the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction.

Authors:  James M Smartt; Patrick Gerety; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Brad E Snyder; Todd Wilson; Terry Scarborough; Sherman Yu; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-09-02

3.  A new dimension: robotic reconstruction in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Nima P Patel; Justin Van Meeteren; John Pedersen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  Leader manipulator with hand rest function for microsurgery.

Authors:  Solmon Jeong; Kotaro Tadano
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Robotic Harvest of a Right Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Flap.

Authors:  Pedro Ciudad; Shivprasad Date; Ming-Hsien Lee; Federico Lo Torto; Fabio Nicoli; Jun Araki; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-03-18

6.  A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-From Inception to the Future.

Authors:  Thomas D Dobbs; Olivia Cundy; Harsh Samarendra; Khurram Khan; Iain Stuart Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-15

Review 7.  Robotic (super) microsurgery: Feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions.

Authors:  Tom J M van Mulken; Rutger M Schols; Shan S Qiu; Kaj Brouwers; Lisette T Hoekstra; Darren I Booi; Raimondo Cau; Ferry Schoenmakers; Andrea M J Scharmga; Rene R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Current surgical practices of robotic-assisted tissue repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Ying-Jun Su; Chi-Yu Jia
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-27

9.  A microsurgical robot research platform for robot-assisted microsurgery research and training.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Junhong Chen; Wei Li; Daniel Bautista Salinas; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Current Limitations of Surgical Robotics in Reconstructive Plastic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Youri P A Tan; Philippe Liverneaux; Jason K F Wong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.