Literature DB >> 16177413

Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program.

Tommy E Cupples1, Joan E Cunningham, James C Reynolds.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to prospectively assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on screening outcomes in a regional mammography program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, 27,274 consecutive screenings were performed. Radiologists' performance before CAD (n = 7,872) and with CAD (n = 19,402) was determined by annual audits. All positive biopsy results were reviewed; histopathology was reviewed and confirmed. Outcomes (recall, biopsy, and cancer detection rates) with CAD (1999, 2000) were compared with historical control data (1998).
RESULTS: With CAD, increases were seen in recall rate (8.1%, from 7.7% to 8.3%), biopsy rate (6.7%, from 1.4% to 1.5%), and cancer detection rate (16.1%, from 3.7 per 1,000 to 4.3 per 1,000). Detection rate of invasive cancers of 1.0 cm or less increased 164% (from 0.508 to 1.34 per 1,000 screens; p = 0.069). Detection rate of in situ cancers declined 6.7% (from 1.27 to 1.19 per 1,000; p = 0.849). In multivariable analysis of invasive cancers, early stage (stage I) was strongly associated with detection by CAD (odds ratio = 4.13, p = 0.025). Mean age at screening detection of cancer was 5.3 years younger in the CAD group than in the pre-CAD group (p = 0.060).
CONCLUSION: Increased detection rate, younger age at diagnosis, and significantly earlier stage of invasive cancer detection are consistent with a positive screening impact of CAD. Audit results were positive but generally not statistically significant due to sample size limitations. Our findings support the hypothesis that screening with CAD significantly improves detection of the specific cancer morphologies that CAD algorithms were designed to detect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16177413     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  31 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yao Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Workflow in digital screening mammography].

Authors:  U Bick; F Diekmann; E M Fallenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 5.  [Quantitative parametric analysis of contrast-enhanced lesions in dynamic MR mammography].

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.

Authors:  Toyohiko Tanaka; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ohta; Tsuyoshi Kobayashi; Akiko Kano; Keiko Tsuchiya; Yoko Murakami; Sawako Kitahara; Makoto Wakamiya; Akira Furukawa; Masashi Takahashi; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Guibo Xing; Joann G Elmore; Heejung Bang; Steven L Chen; Karen K Lindfors; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  "CADEAT": considerations on the use of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography.

Authors:  R Chersevani; S Ciatto; C Del Favero; A Frigerio; L Giordano; G Giuseppetti; C Naldoni; P Panizza; M Petrella; G Saguatti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) in mammography: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a new algorithm (Cyclopus, Medicad) with two commercial systems.

Authors:  S Ciatto; D Cascio; F Fauci; R Magro; G Raso; R Ienzi; F Martinelli; M Vasile Simone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.