Literature DB >> 16176917

Human milk biomonitoring data: interpretation and risk assessment issues.

Judy S LaKind1, Robert L Brent, Michael L Dourson, Sam Kacew, Gideon Koren, Babasaheb Sonawane, Anita J Tarzian, Kathleen Uhl.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring data can, under certain conditions, be used to describe potential risks to human health (for example, blood lead levels used to determine children's neurodevelopmental risk). At present, there are very few chemical exposures at low levels for which sufficient data exist to state with confidence the link between levels of environmental chemicals in a person's body and his or her risk of adverse health effects. Human milk biomonitoring presents additional complications. Human milk can be used to obtain information on both the levels of environmental chemicals in the mother and her infant's exposure to an environmental chemical. However, in terms of the health of the mother, there are little to no extant data that can be used to link levels of most environmental chemicals in human milk to a particular health outcome in the mother. This is because, traditionally, risks are estimated based on dose, rather than on levels of environmental chemicals in the body, and the relationship between dose and human tissue levels is complex. On the other hand, for the infant, some information on dose is available because the infant is exposed to environmental chemicals in milk as a "dose" from which risk estimates can be derived. However, the traditional risk assessment approach is not designed to consider the benefits to the infant associated with breastfeeding and is complicated by the relatively short-term exposures to the infant from breastfeeding. A further complexity derives from the addition of in utero exposures, which complicates interpretation of epidemiological research on health outcomes of breastfeeding infants. Thus, the concept of "risk assessment" as it applies to human milk biomonitoring is not straightforward, and methodologies for undertaking this type of assessment have not yet been fully developed. This article describes the deliberations of the panel convened for the Technical Workshop on Human Milk Surveillance and Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals in the United States, held at the Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, on several issues related to risk assessment and human milk biomonitoring. Discussion of these topics and the thoughts and conclusions of the panel are described in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176917     DOI: 10.1080/15287390500225724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  8 in total

1.  Correlation between lead levels in drinking water and mothers' breast milk: Dakahlia, Egypt.

Authors:  Raafat A Mandour; Abdel-Aziz Ghanem; Somaia M El-Azab
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Improving the risk assessment of lipophilic persistent environmental chemicals in breast milk.

Authors:  Geniece M Lehmann; Marc-André Verner; Bryan Luukinen; Cara Henning; Sue Anne Assimon; Judy S LaKind; Eva D McLanahan; Linda J Phillips; Matthew H Davis; Christina M Powers; Erin P Hines; Sami Haddad; Matthew P Longnecker; Michael T Poulsen; David G Farrer; Satori A Marchitti; Yu-Mei Tan; Jeffrey C Swartout; Sharon K Sagiv; Clement Welsh; Jerry L Campbell; Warren G Foster; Raymond S H Yang; Suzanne E Fenton; Rogelio Tornero-Velez; Bettina M Francis; John B Barnett; Hisham A El-Masri; Jane Ellen Simmons
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  Mercury exposure and children's health.

Authors:  Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Kathleen M McCarty; Nadine Steckling; Beate Lettmeier
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  Biomarkers of mercury toxicity: Past, present, and future trends.

Authors:  Vasco Branco; Sam Caito; Marcelo Farina; João Teixeira da Rocha; Michael Aschner; Cristina Carvalho
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Workgroup report: Biomonitoring study design, interpretation, and communication--lessons learned and path forward.

Authors:  Michael N Bates; Joshua W Hamilton; Judy S LaKind; Patricia Langenberg; Michael O'Malley; Wayne Snodgrass
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Biomonitoring and biomarkers: exposure assessment will never be the same.

Authors:  Dennis Paustenbach; David Galbraith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Identifying important life stages for monitoring and assessing risks from exposures to environmental contaminants: results of a World Health Organization review.

Authors:  Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Thea de Wet; Lilo Du Toit; Michael P Firestone; Mathuros Ruchirawat; Jacqueline van Engelen; Carolyn Vickers
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  Environmental Chemicals in Breast Milk and Formula: Exposure and Risk Assessment Implications.

Authors:  Geniece M Lehmann; Judy S LaKind; Matthew H Davis; Erin P Hines; Satori A Marchitti; Cecilia Alcala; Matthew Lorber
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.