Literature DB >> 16176720

A comparison of DNA pools constructed following whole genome amplification for two-stage SNP genotyping designs.

Zhen Zhen Zhao1, Dale R Nyholt, Michael R James, Renee Mayne, Susan A Treloar, Grant W Montgomery.   

Abstract

Genotyping in DNA pools reduces the cost and the time required to complete large genotyping projects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate pooling as part of a strategy for fine mapping in regions of significant linkage. Thirty-nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed in two genomic DNA pools of 384 individuals each and results compared with data after typing all individuals used in the pools. There were no significant differences using data from either 2 or 8 heterozygous individuals to correct frequency estimates for unequal allelic amplification. After correction, the mean difference between estimates from the genomic pool and individual allele frequencies was .033. A major limitation of the use of DNA pools is the time and effort required to carefully adjust the concentration of each individual DNA sample before mixing aliquots. Pools were also constructed by combining DNA after Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA). The MDA pools gave similar results to pools constructed after careful DNA quantitation (mean difference from individual genotyping .040) and MDA provides a rapid method to generate pools suitable for some applications. Pools provide a rapid and cost-effective screen to eliminate SNPs that are not polymorphic in a test population and can detect minor allele frequencies as low as 1% in the pooled samples. With current levels of accuracy, pooling is best suited to an initial screen in the SNP validation process that can provide high-throughput comparisons between cases and controls to prioritize SNPs for subsequent individual genotyping.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176720     DOI: 10.1375/1832427054936718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  5 in total

1.  Technologies in the Whole-Genome Age: MALDI-TOF-Based Genotyping.

Authors:  Nicolas Vogel; Katrin Schiebel; Andreas Humeny
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Common variants in the CYP2C19 gene are associated with susceptibility to endometriosis.

Authors:  Jodie N Painter; Dale R Nyholt; Lutz Krause; Zhen Z Zhao; Brett Chapman; Christine Zhang; Sarah Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Stephen Kennedy; Susan Treloar; Krina Zondervan; Grant W Montgomery
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Analysis of pooled DNA samples on high density arrays without prior knowledge of differential hybridization rates.

Authors:  Stuart Macgregor; Peter M Visscher; Grant Montgomery
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation, time-of-flight mass spectrometry in genomics research.

Authors:  Jiannis Ragoussis; Gareth P Elvidge; Kulvinder Kaur; Stefano Colella
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Highly cost-efficient genome-wide association studies using DNA pools and dense SNP arrays.

Authors:  Stuart Macgregor; Zhen Zhen Zhao; Anjali Henders; Martin G Nicholas; Grant W Montgomery; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.