Literature DB >> 16175871

The evolution of Harvey Cushing's surgical approach to pituitary tumors from transsphenoidal to transfrontal.

Aaron A Cohen-Gadol1, Edward R Laws, Dennis D Spencer, Antonio A F De Salles.   

Abstract

The evolution of transsphenoidal surgery represents a special chapter in the progress of neurosurgery. Although Cushing initially advocated a transsphenoidal approach to pituitary tumors, he became disenchanted with this approach, ultimately favoring the subfrontal or "transfrontal" route late in his career. Other neurosurgeons followed Cushing's example, and the fate of transsphenoidal surgery entered a dark era in 1929. A review of Cushing's patients' records reveals that his abandonment of the transsphenoidal route was primarily related to the limitations of this approach in providing effective resection of large pituitary lesions-the symptomatic tumor recurrence rate after this procedure was substantial. Furthermore, given the preoperative uncertainty about the suprasellar extension of pituitary tumors prior to modern neuroimaging, the transfrontal route assured Cushing an adequate decompression of the optic chiasm. By 1927, Cushing's mastery of intracranial surgery was accompanied by the use of electrosurgical methods that enabled him to remove sellar lesions through the transfrontal route safely and with timely and effective restoration of visual loss. Transsphenoidal surgery remained relatively dormant, awaiting the efforts and enthusiasm of Norman Dott who bridged the gap between Cushing and Gerard Guiot, the surgeon who revitalized transsphenoidal adenomectomy for future generations of pituitary surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16175871     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of extracranial approaches to the pituitary and anterior skull base.

Authors:  Ashley E Grosvenor; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Surgery for acromegaly: evolution of the techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Edward R Laws
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Harvey Cushing, the spine surgeon: the surgical treatment of Pott disease.

Authors:  Ali Bydon; Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Courtney Pendleton; Matthew J McGirt; Ziya L Gokaslan; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Endoscopic endonasal surgery for recurrent pituitary tumors: technical challenges to the surgical approach.

Authors:  Bobby A Tajudeen; Jagmeet Mundi; Jeffrey D Suh; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-09-13

5.  Pro: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is superior to microscope-based transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Adam N Mamelak
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Walter E. Dandy: his contributions to pituitary surgery in the context of the overall Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.

Authors:  Andrea Corsello; Giulia Di Dalmazi; Fabiana Pani; Paulina Chalan; Roberto Salvatori; Patrizio Caturegli
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives.

Authors:  Ciro Mastantuoni; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Felice Esposito; Elena d'Avella; Oreste de Divitiis; Teresa Somma; Andrea Bocchino; Gianluca Lorenzo Fabozzi; Paolo Cappabianca; Domenico Solari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Surgery for acromegaly: Indications and goals.

Authors:  David P Bray; Sai Mannam; Rima S Rindler; Joseph W Quillin; Nelson M Oyesiku
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.055

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.