L W Braga1, A C Júnior Da Paz, M Ylvisaker. 1. SARAH University for Rehabilitation Sciences, SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brasilia, Brazil. luciabraga@sarah.br
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To explore the relative effectiveness of clinician-delivered vs family-supported interventions for children with chronic impairment after TBI. RESEARCH DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Children aged 5-12 years in the chronic phase of their recovery were randomly assigned to the clinician-delivered or to the family-supported intervention group; both samples received intensive services for 1 year; physical outcome was measured by the SARAH scales, cognitive outcome by the WISC-III. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Parents in the family-supported intervention sample efficiently acquired the skills needed to deliver physical and cognitive interventions within the context of everyday routines of the child's life at home; family education level was not a factor. Although both groups demonstrated improvements, only the children in the family-supported intervention group demonstrated statistically significant--and clinically important--improvements on both outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides compelling evidence for organizing cognitive and physical interventions and supports for children with TBI around the everyday routines of their lives, with intensive supports for their families.
RCT Entities:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To explore the relative effectiveness of clinician-delivered vs family-supported interventions for children with chronic impairment after TBI. RESEARCH DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Children aged 5-12 years in the chronic phase of their recovery were randomly assigned to the clinician-delivered or to the family-supported intervention group; both samples received intensive services for 1 year; physical outcome was measured by the SARAH scales, cognitive outcome by the WISC-III. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Parents in the family-supported intervention sample efficiently acquired the skills needed to deliver physical and cognitive interventions within the context of everyday routines of the child's life at home; family education level was not a factor. Although both groups demonstrated improvements, only the children in the family-supported intervention group demonstrated statistically significant--and clinically important--improvements on both outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides compelling evidence for organizing cognitive and physical interventions and supports for children with TBI around the everyday routines of their lives, with intensive supports for their families.
Authors: Cydni N Williams; Mary E Hartman; Kristin P Guilliams; Rejean M Guerriero; Juan A Piantino; Christopher C Bosworth; Skyler S Leonard; Kathryn Bradbury; Amanda Wagner; Trevor A Hall Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Aimee Gerrard-Morris; H Gerry Taylor; Keith Owen Yeates; Nicolay Chertkoff Walz; Terry Stancin; Nori Minich; Shari L Wade Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Robert W Butler; Donna R Copeland; Diane L Fairclough; Raymond K Mulhern; Ernest R Katz; Anne E Kazak; Robert B Noll; Sunita K Patel; Olle Jane Z Sahler Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2008-06
Authors: Eric B Elbogen; Paul A Dennis; Elizabeth E Van Voorhees; Shannon M Blakey; Jacqueline L Johnson; Sally C Johnson; H Ryan Wagner; Robert M Hamer; Jean C Beckham; Tom Manly; Aysenil Belger Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2019 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.710