Literature DB >> 16175324

Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series.

David W Larson1, Eric J Dozois, Karen Piotrowicz, Robert R Cima, Bruce G Wolff, Tonia M Young-Fadok.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional outcomes in laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have been incompletely studied. More than one-year follow-up has rarely been reported in these patients. This study was designed to assess operative, functional, and quality of life outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis a minimum of one year after.
METHODS: Thirty-three laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 33 open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients, with a median of 13 months and minimum of 12 months follow-up, were identified from a prospective, laparoscopic database. Functional outcome was prospectively assessed by using a standardized survey. These cohorts were matched by individual patient for year of surgery, age, gender, body mass index, and indication.
RESULTS: Median age was 27 years (open) and 28 years (laparoscopic). There were 27 females and 6 males in each group. All operations occurred between 1999 and 2001. Median body mass index was 22.3 (open) and 21.7 (laparoscopic) groups. There were no significant differences in diagnosis, use of diversion, and anastomotic technique. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 6 percent of the laparoscopic cases and 12 percent of the open cases. Functional outcome after a minimum of one year revealed equivalent median day and median nocturnal number of stools of six to seven and one to two respectively. Consistency of stool, medication usage, and continence were no different between groups. Daytime and nocturnal incontinence was similar. Quality of life in regard to social, home life, family, travel, sports, recreation, and sex life were equivalent.
CONCLUSIONS: The function and quality of life outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis seem to be equivalent to our open experience. Laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis offers selected patients a safe, feasible, and durable alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16175324     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0143-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Luca Stocchi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-12

2.  Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience.

Authors:  David W Larson; Robert R Cima; Eric J Dozois; Michael Davies; Karen Piotrowicz; Sunni A Barnes; Bruce Wolff; John Pemberton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Boller; David W Larson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Recent trends in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Robert E Roses; John L Rombeau
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life, body image, cosmesis, and functional results.

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Francesca Erroi; Cesare Ruffolo; Eleonora Mollica; Lino Polese; Giulia Pozza; Lorenzo Norberto; Davide F D'Amico; Imerio Angriman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single incision laparoscopic (SILS) restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  K J Gash; A C Goede; B Kaldowski; B Vestweber; A R Dixon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Case-Matched Comparison of Long-Term Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Olga A Lavryk; Luca Stocchi; Jean H Ashburn; Meagan Costedio; Emre Gorgun; Tracy L Hull; Hermann Kessler; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pushing the envelope.

Authors:  Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

10.  Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: prospective series of 82 patients.

Authors:  Jérémie H Lefevre; Frédéric Bretagnol; Mehdi Ouaïssi; Philippe Taleb; Arnaud Alves; Yves Panis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.