Literature DB >> 16174857

Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors.

Lois B Travis1, Sophie D Fosså, Sara J Schonfeld, Mary L McMaster, Charles F Lynch, Hans Storm, Per Hall, Eric Holowaty, Aage Andersen, Eero Pukkala, Michael Andersson, Magnus Kaijser, Mary Gospodarowicz, Timo Joensuu, Randi J Cohen, John D Boice, Graça M Dores, Ethel S Gilbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although second primary cancers are a leading cause of death among men with testicular cancer, few studies have quantified risks among long-term survivors.
METHODS: Within 14 population-based tumor registries in Europe and North America (1943-2001), we identified 40,576 1-year survivors of testicular cancer and ascertained data on any new incident solid tumors among these patients. We used Poisson regression analysis to model relative risks (RRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) of second solid cancers. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: A total of 2,285 second solid cancers were reported in the cohort. The relative risk and EAR decreased with increasing age at testicular cancer diagnosis (P < .001); the EAR increased with attained age (P < .001) but the excess RR decreased. Among 10-year survivors diagnosed with testicular cancer at age 35 years, the risk of developing a second solid tumor was increased (RR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8 to 2.1). Risk remained statistically significantly elevated for 35 years (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.0; P < .001). We observed statistically significantly elevated risks, for the first time, for cancers of the pleura (malignant mesothelioma; RR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 5.9) and esophagus (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.6). Cancers of the lung (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.7), colon (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.5), bladder (RR = 2.7, 95% CI = 2.2 to 3.1), pancreas (RR = 3.6, 95% CI = 2.8 to 4.6), and stomach (RR = 4.0, 95% CI = 3.2 to 4.8) accounted for almost 60% of the total excess. Overall patterns were similar for seminoma and nonseminoma patients, with lower risks observed for nonseminoma patients treated after 1975. Statistically significantly increased risks of solid cancers were observed among patients treated with radiotherapy alone (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.9 to 2.2), chemotherapy alone (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3 to 2.5), and both (RR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.9 to 4.2). For patients diagnosed with seminomas or nonseminomatous tumors at age 35 years, cumulative risks of solid cancer 40 years later (i.e., to age 75 years) were 36% and 31%, respectively, compared with 23% for the general population.
CONCLUSIONS: Testicular cancer survivors are at statistically significantly increased risk of solid tumors for at least 35 years after treatment. Young patients may experience high levels of risk as they reach older ages. The statistically significantly increased risk of malignant mesothelioma in testicular cancer survivors has, to our knowledge, not been observed previously in a cohort of patients treated with radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16174857     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  221 in total

1.  Testicular cancer: Underestimating radiotherapy toxicity for stage I seminoma.

Authors:  Nicklas Pfanzelter; Justin E Bekelman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Intervention format and delivery preferences among young adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Carolyn Rabin; Norah Simpson; Kathleen Morrow; Bernardine Pinto
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-06

3.  Mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Frank E Mott
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

4.  Malignant Gastrocolic Fistula as a Late Complication of Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Joan Costelloe; Clare O'Connell; Orla Mc Cormack; Finbar MacCarthy; Darragh F Halpenny; Ramadan Shatwan; Cian Muldoon; Narayanasamy Ravi; John V Reynolds
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  Review of health behaviors and their correlates among young adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Carolyn Rabin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-08-04

6.  Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael Jewett; Peter Chung; Sebastian Hotte; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eric Winquist; Scott North; Scott Tyldesley; Jeremy Sturgeon; Mary Gospodarowicz; Roanne Segal; Tina Cheng; Peter Venner; Malcolm Moore; Peter Albers; Robert Huddart; Craig Nichols; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  A new view of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  I Shuryak; R K Sachs; D J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 8.  [Long-term toxicity after therapy for testicular cancer with special focus on sexual disorders].

Authors:  J Oldenburg; S D Fosså
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Accelerated Premalignant Polyposis and Second Colon Cancers: Incriminating Immunosuppression, Radiotherapy, and Systemic Chemotherapy Agents.

Authors:  Frank J Senatore; Shruti Murali; Constantin A Dasanu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-06

10.  Solid tumors after chemotherapy or surgery for testicular nonseminoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chunkit Fung; Sophie D Fossa; Michael T Milano; Jan Oldenburg; Lois B Travis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.