Literature DB >> 16174506

Effect of first metatarsal shortening and dorsiflexion osteotomies on forefoot plantar pressure in a cadaver model.

Hung-Geun Jung1, David I Zaret, Brent G Parks, Lew C Schon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metatarsalgia of the second ray is a common problem associated with disorders of the first metatarsal. It also occurs after the operative treatment of those disorders. Plantar pressure changes from alteration of the static and dynamic structure of the forefoot may be associated with this condition. This study evaluated changes in plantar forefoot pressure especially under the second metatarsal head after three operative procedures on the first ray.
METHODS: Each of 12 cadaver foot specimens was cyclically loaded on the servohydraulic MTS Mini Bionix test frame (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN) with traction on the Achilles tendon. Plantar forefoot pressure was measured by the F-scan system (Tekscan, Inc., S. Boston, MA) with the foot intact, after a first metatarsal base dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy with 5-mm base length to simulate dorsal malunion, and after 5-mm and 10-mm metatarsal shortening procedures. Paired Student t-test analysis was used to compare data for the intact foot with data after each intervention. One form of Bonferroni's correction was done to establish a new alpha level to tighten the analysis and to compensate for multiple paired Student t-tests. The significance level was calculated to be 0.016 based on an original alpha level of 0.05.
RESULTS: As compared with the intact foot, all three procedures on the first metatarsal resulted in significant decreases in plantar pressure under the first metatarsal head (p < 0.016). Plantar pressure under the second metatarsal head increased significantly as compared with the intact foot (p < 0.016) after all three procedures. Pressures under the third-fourth metatarsal heads increased significantly compared with the intact foot after the 5-mm and 10-mm shortenings (p < 0.016). Plantar pressure under the fifth metatarsal did not change significantly after any of the three procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Dorsiflexion osteotomy and shortening of the first metatarsal are associated with significant forefoot plantar pressure changes in a cadaver model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16174506     DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

1.  Third-generation minimally invasive correction of hallux valgus: technique and early outcomes.

Authors:  Kit Brogan; Tom Voller; Chris Gee; Tamas Borbely; Simon Palmer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Metatarsal length does not correlate with maximal peak pressure and maximal force.

Authors:  Martin Kaipel; Daniel Krapf; Christian Wyss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Shortening effect influence of Distal Minimally Invasive Metatarsal Osteotomy in primary metatarsalgia.

Authors:  Simon Tournemine; Fabien Calé; Cyrille Cazeau; Thomas Bauer; Yves Stiglitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimally Invasive vs. Open Surgery for Hallux Valgus: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linfeng Ji; Ketao Wang; Shenglong Ding; Chengyi Sun; Songmin Sun; Mingzhu Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21

5.  Rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy for severe hallux valgus with a new evaluation index: distance between the first and second metatarsals.

Authors:  Wenyong Xie; Hao Lu; Guicheng Li; Yusong Yuan; Hailin Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Study of the metatarsal formula in patient with primary metatarsalgia.

Authors:  Eduardo Kenzo Arie; Norma Sueli Albino Moreira; Gilmar Soares Freire; Bruno Schifer Dos Santos; Liu Chiao Yi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-07-11

7.  The excessive length of first ray as a risk factor for hallux valgus recurrence.

Authors:  Xingchen Li; Min Guo; Yuan Zhu; Xiangyang Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.