OBJECTIVE: To determine how the addition of generalist care managers and collaborative information technology to an ambulatory team affects the care of patients with diabetes. STUDY SETTING: Multiple ambulatory clinics within Intermountain Health Care (IHC), a large integrated delivery network. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comparing diabetic patients treated by generalist care managers with matched controls was completed. Exposure patients had one or more contacts with a care manager; controls were matched on utilization, demographics, testing, and baseline glucose control. Using role-specific information technology to support their efforts, care managers assessed patients' readiness for change, followed guidelines, and educated and motivated patients. DATA COLLECTION: Patient data collected as part of an electronic patient record were combined with care manager-created databases to assess timely testing of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels and changes in LDL and HbA1c levels. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a multivariable model, the odds of being overdue for testing for HbA1c decreased by 21 percent in the exposure group (n=1,185) versus the control group (n=4,740). The odds of being tested when overdue for HbA1c or LDL increased by 49 and 26 percent, respectively, and the odds of HbA1c <7.0 percent also increased by 19 percent in the exposure group. The average HbA1c levels decreased more in the exposure group than in the controls. The effect on LDL was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Generalist care managers using computer-supported diabetes management helped increase adherence to guidelines for testing and control of HbA1c levels, leading to improved health status of patients with diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine how the addition of generalist care managers and collaborative information technology to an ambulatory team affects the care of patients with diabetes. STUDY SETTING: Multiple ambulatory clinics within Intermountain Health Care (IHC), a large integrated delivery network. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comparing diabeticpatients treated by generalist care managers with matched controls was completed. Exposure patients had one or more contacts with a care manager; controls were matched on utilization, demographics, testing, and baseline glucose control. Using role-specific information technology to support their efforts, care managers assessed patients' readiness for change, followed guidelines, and educated and motivated patients. DATA COLLECTION: Patient data collected as part of an electronic patient record were combined with care manager-created databases to assess timely testing of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels and changes in LDL and HbA1c levels. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a multivariable model, the odds of being overdue for testing for HbA1c decreased by 21 percent in the exposure group (n=1,185) versus the control group (n=4,740). The odds of being tested when overdue for HbA1c or LDL increased by 49 and 26 percent, respectively, and the odds of HbA1c <7.0 percent also increased by 19 percent in the exposure group. The average HbA1c levels decreased more in the exposure group than in the controls. The effect on LDL was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Generalist care managers using computer-supported diabetes management helped increase adherence to guidelines for testing and control of HbA1c levels, leading to improved health status of patients with diabetes.
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Clemens S Hong; Steven J Atlas; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Yuchiao Chang; Wei He; Timothy G Ferris; Richard W Grant Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gibril J Njie; Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Starr M Banks; David B Callahan; Nicolaas P Pronk; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Thomas E Kottke Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Timothy W Farrell; Leif I Solberg; Carolyn A Berry; Neil S Calman; Peter F Cronholm; Katrina E Donahue; David L Driscoll; Diane Hauser; Jeanne W McAllister; Sanjeev N Mehta; Robert J Reid; Ming Tai-Seale; Christopher G Wise; Michael D Fetters; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Hector P Rodriguez; Cherie P Brunker; Erin L McGinley; Rachel L Day; Debra L Scammon; Michael I Harrison; Janice L Genevro; Robert A Gabbay; Michael K Magill Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2016-10-23 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Zhehui Luo; Qiaoling Chen; Ann M Annis; Gretchen Piatt; Lee A Green; Min Tao; Jodi Summers Holtrop Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sue E Kim; Charles Michalopoulos; Richard M Kwong; Anne Warren; Michelle S Manno Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Adam Wright; Elizabeth A McGlinchey; Eric G Poon; Chelsea A Jenter; David W Bates; Steven R Simon Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 5.428