BACKGROUND: The disturbed behaviour of acute in-patients can have serious consequences, and methods of management are contentious and vary between countries. Little is known about this variation and its relationship to the characteristics of in-patient populations. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare rates and patterns of disturbed behaviours and containment methods in acute psychiatric wards in three centres in the United Kingdom, Italy and Greece. METHOD: A retrospective survey of medical and nursing records (n=838) at seven hospitals for the first 2 weeks of patients' admissions was done using a structured data collection tool. RESULTS: Nearly all types of disruptive behaviour varied by centre, with rates being generally higher in the UK and lowest in Italy. Specific relationships between different behaviours were replicated across all three centres. Ethnic minority patients were more likely to be subject to containment measures in all centres, even when their behaviours did not differ from the majority. Rates of containment method use were only partially related to the frequency of disturbed behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: More research is required to discover the efficacy of varying containment methods, with a view to minimising their use. Gross international and inter-hospital variation demands large samples rather than single site studies. Clinicians need to reflect upon containment rates that may be, in some places, excessive and incorrectly targeted.
BACKGROUND: The disturbed behaviour of acute in-patients can have serious consequences, and methods of management are contentious and vary between countries. Little is known about this variation and its relationship to the characteristics of in-patient populations. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare rates and patterns of disturbed behaviours and containment methods in acute psychiatric wards in three centres in the United Kingdom, Italy and Greece. METHOD: A retrospective survey of medical and nursing records (n=838) at seven hospitals for the first 2 weeks of patients' admissions was done using a structured data collection tool. RESULTS: Nearly all types of disruptive behaviour varied by centre, with rates being generally higher in the UK and lowest in Italy. Specific relationships between different behaviours were replicated across all three centres. Ethnic minority patients were more likely to be subject to containment measures in all centres, even when their behaviours did not differ from the majority. Rates of containment method use were only partially related to the frequency of disturbed behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: More research is required to discover the efficacy of varying containment methods, with a view to minimising their use. Gross international and inter-hospital variation demands large samples rather than single site studies. Clinicians need to reflect upon containment rates that may be, in some places, excessive and incorrectly targeted.
Authors: L Bowers; N Crowhurst; J Alexander; P Callaghan; S Eales; S Guy; E McCann; C Ryan Journal: J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.952
Authors: Johanna Baumgardt; Dorothea Jäckel; Heike Helber-Böhlen; Nicole Stiehm; Karin Morgenstern; Andre Voigt; Enrico Schöppe; Ann-Kathrin Mc Cutcheon; Edwin Emilio Velasquez Lecca; Michael Löhr; Michael Schulz; Andreas Bechdolf; Stefan Weinmann Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: L Bowers; J Alexander; H Bilgin; M Botha; C Dack; K James; M Jarrett; D Jeffery; H Nijman; J A Owiti; C Papadopoulos; J Ross; S Wright; D Stewart Journal: J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 2.952
Authors: Nompilo Moyo; Martin Jones; Diana Kushemererwa; Sandesh Pantha; Sue Gilbert; Lorena Romero; Richard Gray Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 3.390