Literature DB >> 16172231

Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries.

Freddie Bray1, Bendix Carstensen, Henrik Møller, Marco Zappa, Maja Primic Zakelj, Gill Lawrence, Matti Hakama, Elisabete Weiderpass.   

Abstract

Rapid increases in cervical adenocarcinoma incidence have been observed in Western countries in recent decades. Postulated explanations include an increasing specificity of subtype-the capability to diagnose the disease, an inability of cytologic screening to reduce adenocarcinoma, and heterogeneity in cofactors related to persistent human papillomavirus infection. This study examines the possible contribution of these factors in relation with trends observed in Europe. Age-period-cohort models were fitted to cervical adenocarcinoma incidence trends in women ages <75 in 13 European countries. Age-adjusted adenocarcinoma incidence rates increased throughout Europe, the rate of increase ranging from around 0.5% per annum in Denmark, Sweden, and Switzerland to >/=3% in Finland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The increases first affected generations born in the early 1930s through the mid-1940s, with risk invariably higher in women born in the mid-1960s relative to those born 20 years earlier. The magnitude of this risk ratio varied considerably from around 7 in Slovenia to almost unity in France. Declines in period-specific risk were observed in United Kingdom, Denmark, and Sweden, primarily among women ages >30. Whereas increasing specificity of subtype with time may be responsible for some of the increases in several countries, the changing distribution and prevalence of persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus types, alongside an inability to detect cervical adenocarcinoma within screening programs, would accord with the temporal profile observed in Europe. The homogeneity of trends in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in birth cohort is consistent with the notion that they share a similar etiology irrespective of the differential capability of screen detection. Screening may have had at least some impact in reducing cervical adenocarcinoma incidence in several countries during the 1990s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172231     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  96 in total

1.  Characteristics of 44 cervical cancers diagnosed following Pap-negative, high risk HPV-positive screening in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Walter Kinney; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Thomas Lorey; Tracy Flanagan; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.

Authors:  Z Hilal; C Tempfer; S Schiermeier; J Reinecke; C Ruppenkamp; Z Hilal
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Prospective study of human papillomavirus and risk of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lisen Arnheim Dahlström; Nathalie Ylitalo; Karin Sundström; Juni Palmgren; Alexander Ploner; Sandra Eloranta; Carani B Sanjeevi; Sonia Andersson; Thomas Rohan; Joakim Dillner; Hans-Olov Adami; Pär Sparén
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Neither one-time negative screening tests nor negative colposcopy provides absolute reassurance against cervical cancer.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Ana C Rodríguez; Robert D Burk; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Diane Solomon; Mark E Sherman; Jose Jeronimo; Mario Alfaro; Jorge Morales; Diego Guillén; Martha L Hutchinson; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

6.  Human papillomavirus in high-grade cervical lesions: Austrian data of a European multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Rössler; Olaf Reich; Reinhard Horvat; Sabrina Collas de Souza; Katsyarina Holl; Elmar A Joura
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nisa M Maruthur; Shari D Bolen; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Long term risk of invasive cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Björn Strander; Agneta Andersson-Ellström; Ian Milsom; Pär Sparén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-24

9.  Effectiveness of national cervical cancer screening programme in Taiwan: 12-year experiences.

Authors:  Y-Y Chen; S-L You; C-A Chen; L-Y Shih; S-L Koong; K-Y Chao; M-L Hsiao; C-Y Hsieh; C-J Chen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005-2008).

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt; Mairi Langan; Helen Bedford; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.