BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that a low level of the 2-hydroxyestrogen metabolites (2-OHE) and a high level of 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1) are associated with an enhanced risk of breast cancer. We examined the association between the metabolite levels and breast cancer in a nested case-control study, which also addressed hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and estrogen receptor status of the tumors. METHODS: 24,697 postmenopausal Danish women were enrolled in the "Diet, Cancer and Health" cohort. During follow-up, 426 breast cancer cases were identified and controls were matched by age at diagnosis, baseline age, and HRT use. The concentrations of 2-OHE and 16alpha-OHE1 in spot urine were measured by an enzyme immunoassay. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for total and estrogen receptor-specific breast cancer and were stratified according to HRT use. RESULTS: A higher incidence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer with an enhanced 2-OHE level was observed among current HRT users, IRR per doubling = 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.66), whereas no association was seen among nonusers of HRT, IRR per doubling = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.69-1.45). The association between estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and the 16alpha-OHE1 metabolite level was in the opposite direction but slightly weaker and statistically insignificant. For estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, no significant associations were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of breast cancer, in particular the estrogen receptor-positive type, was enhanced among postmenopausal women using estradiol-based HRT and among those who had a high 2-OHE concentration.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that a low level of the 2-hydroxyestrogen metabolites (2-OHE) and a high level of 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1) are associated with an enhanced risk of breast cancer. We examined the association between the metabolite levels and breast cancer in a nested case-control study, which also addressed hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and estrogen receptor status of the tumors. METHODS: 24,697 postmenopausal Danish women were enrolled in the "Diet, Cancer and Health" cohort. During follow-up, 426 breast cancer cases were identified and controls were matched by age at diagnosis, baseline age, and HRT use. The concentrations of 2-OHE and 16alpha-OHE1 in spot urine were measured by an enzyme immunoassay. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for total and estrogen receptor-specific breast cancer and were stratified according to HRT use. RESULTS: A higher incidence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer with an enhanced 2-OHE level was observed among current HRT users, IRR per doubling = 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.66), whereas no association was seen among nonusers of HRT, IRR per doubling = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.69-1.45). The association between estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and the 16alpha-OHE1 metabolite level was in the opposite direction but slightly weaker and statistically insignificant. For estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, no significant associations were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of breast cancer, in particular the estrogen receptor-positive type, was enhanced among postmenopausal women using estradiol-based HRT and among those who had a high 2-OHE concentration.
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Donna Spiegelman; Xia Xu; Larry K Keefer; Timothy D Veenstra; Robert L Barbieri; Walter C Willett; Susan E Hankinson; Regina G Ziegler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Cher M Dallal; Jeffrey A Tice; Diana S M Buist; Douglas C Bauer; James V Lacey; Jane A Cauley; Trisha F Hue; Andrea Lacroix; Roni T Falk; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Barbara J Fuhrman; Timothy D Veenstra; Xia Xu; Louise A Brinton Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Alan A Arslan; Karen L Koenig; Per Lenner; Yelena Afanasyeva; Roy E Shore; Yu Chen; Eva Lundin; Paolo Toniolo; Göran Hallmans; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Theresa J Fanelli; Francesmary Modugno; Jane A Cauley; Kathleen M McTigue; Maria Mori Brooks; Rowan T Chlebowski; JoAnn E Manson; Thomas L Klug; Kevin E Kip; J David Curb; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Steven C Moore; Charles E Matthews; Xiao Ou Shu; Kai Yu; Mitchell H Gail; Xia Xu; Bu-Tian Ji; Wong-Ho Chow; Qiuyin Cai; Honglan Li; Gong Yang; David Ruggieri; Jennifer Boyd-Morin; Nathaniel Rothman; Robert N Hoover; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng; Regina G Ziegler Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Stacey A Missmer; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Regina G Ziegler; Bernard Rosner; Timothy D Veenstra; John M Roman; Xia Xu; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 4.254