BACKGROUND: A history of diabetes mellitus and a diet high in glycemic load are both potential risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Sugar-sweetened soft drinks are a prevalent source of readily absorbable sugars and have been associated with an increased risk of obesity and diabetes. We investigated whether higher consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks increases the risk of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We examined the relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and the development of pancreatic cancer in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Among 88,794 women and 49,364 men without cancer at baseline, we documented 379 cases of pancreatic cancer during up to 20 years of follow-up. Soft drink consumption was first assessed at baseline (1980 for the women, 1986 for the men) and updated periodically thereafter. RESULTS: Compared with participants who largely abstained from sugar-sweetened soft drinks, those who consumed more than three sugar-sweetened soft drinks weekly experienced overall a multivariate relative risk (RR) of pancreatic cancer of 1.13 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.81-1.58; P for trend = 0.47]. Women in the highest category of sugar-sweetened soft drink intake did experience a significant increase in risk (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02-2.41; P for trend = 0.05), whereas there was no association between sweetened soft drink intake and pancreatic cancer among men. Among women, the risk associated with higher sugar-sweetened soft drink was limited to those with elevated body mass index (>25 kg/m(2); RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.96-3.72) or with low physical activity (RR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.06-3.85). In contrast, consumption of diet soft drinks was not associated with an elevated pancreatic cancer risk in either cohort. CONCLUSION: Although soft drink consumption did not influence pancreatic cancer risk among men, consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks may be associated with a modest but significant increase in risk among women who have an underlying degree of insulin resistance.
BACKGROUND: A history of diabetes mellitus and a diet high in glycemic load are both potential risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Sugar-sweetened soft drinks are a prevalent source of readily absorbable sugars and have been associated with an increased risk of obesity and diabetes. We investigated whether higher consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks increases the risk of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We examined the relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and the development of pancreatic cancer in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Among 88,794 women and 49,364 men without cancer at baseline, we documented 379 cases of pancreatic cancer during up to 20 years of follow-up. Soft drink consumption was first assessed at baseline (1980 for the women, 1986 for the men) and updated periodically thereafter. RESULTS: Compared with participants who largely abstained from sugar-sweetened soft drinks, those who consumed more than three sugar-sweetened soft drinks weekly experienced overall a multivariate relative risk (RR) of pancreatic cancer of 1.13 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.81-1.58; P for trend = 0.47]. Women in the highest category of sugar-sweetened soft drink intake did experience a significant increase in risk (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02-2.41; P for trend = 0.05), whereas there was no association between sweetened soft drink intake and pancreatic cancer among men. Among women, the risk associated with higher sugar-sweetened soft drink was limited to those with elevated body mass index (>25 kg/m(2); RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.96-3.72) or with low physical activity (RR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.06-3.85). In contrast, consumption of diet soft drinks was not associated with an elevated pancreatic cancer risk in either cohort. CONCLUSION: Although soft drink consumption did not influence pancreatic cancer risk among men, consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks may be associated with a modest but significant increase in risk among women who have an underlying degree of insulin resistance.
Authors: Rosangela A Pereira; Amanda M Souza; Kiyah J Duffey; Rosely Sichieri; Barry M Popkin Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kimber L Stanhope; Steven C Griffen; Andrew A Bremer; Roel G Vink; Ernst J Schaefer; Katsuyuki Nakajima; Jean-Marc Schwarz; Carine Beysen; Lars Berglund; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Vasanti S Malik; Yanping Li; An Pan; Lawrence De Koning; Eva Schernhammer; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeanine M Genkinger; Ruifeng Li; Donna Spiegelman; Kristin E Anderson; Demetrius Albanes; Leif Bergkvist; Leslie Bernstein; Amanda Black; Piet A van den Brandt; Dallas R English; Jo L Freudenheim; Charles S Fuchs; Graham G Giles; Edward Giovannucci; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Eric J Jacobs; Anita Koushik; Satu Männistö; James R Marshall; Anthony B Miller; Alpa V Patel; Kim Robien; Thomas E Rohan; Catherine Schairer; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Alicja Wolk; Regina G Ziegler; Stephanie A Smith-Warner Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ying Bao; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Li Jiao; Debra T Silverman; Amy F Subar; Yikyung Park; Michael F Leitzmann; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Dominique S Michaud Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.045