Literature DB >> 16171842

Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: implications for models of motion perception.

Peter Thompson1, Kevin Brooks, Stephen T Hammett.   

Abstract

It is well-known that reducing the contrast of a slow moving stimulus reduces its apparent speed. [Thompson, P. (1982). Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast. Vision Research, 22, 377-380.] report of this finding also suggested that at speeds above 8 cycles/s reducing contrast increased perceived speed. However in a later report, Stone and Thompson (1992), using a more rigorous, forced-choice procedure, failed to collect reliable data at these higher speeds. Here, we confirm that faster moving stimuli can appear to move faster than their true speed at low contrasts and we propose a physiologically plausible ratio model that unlike recent Bayesian models (e.g. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. P., & Adelson, E. H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 598-604) can account well for the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16171842     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  Interactions between speed and contrast tuning in the middle temporal area: implications for the neural code for speed.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Richard J A van Wezel; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Contrast affects speed tuning, space-time slant, and receptive-field organization of simple cells in macaque V1.

Authors:  Margaret S Livingstone; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The lazy shadow: a monocular counterpart to the Pulfrich stereo phenomenon.

Authors:  Lars Frisén
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Misperceptions of speed are accounted for by the responses of neurons in macaque cortical area MT.

Authors:  Pinar Boyraz; Stefan Treue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cortical correlates of human motion perception biases.

Authors:  Brett Vintch; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Apparent speed increases at low luminance.

Authors:  Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A Bayesian model of perceived head-centered velocity during smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Rebecca A Champion; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Fast development of global motion processing in human infants.

Authors:  Emily J Blumenthal; Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  What a difference a parameter makes: a psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms.

Authors:  Praveen K Pilly; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.