Literature DB >> 16170920

"Science in a democracy": the contested status of vaccination in the Progressive Era and the 1920s.

James Colgrove1.   

Abstract

In the first decades of the twentieth century, a heterogeneous assortment of groups and individuals articulated scientific, political, and philosophical objections to vaccination. They engaged in an ongoing battle for public opinion with medical and scientific elites, who responded with their own counterpropaganda. These ideological struggles reflected fear that scientific advances were being put to coercive uses and that institutions of the state and civil society were increasingly expanding into previously private realms of decision making, especially child rearing. This essay analyzes the motivations and tactics of antivaccination activists and situates their actions within the scientific and social climate of the Progressive Era and the 1920s. Their actions reveal how citizens of varied ideological persuasions, activists and nonactivists alike, viewed scientific knowledge during a period of swift and unsettling change, when the application of biologic products seemed to hold peril as well as promise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170920     DOI: 10.1086/431531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isis        ISSN: 0021-1753            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

1.  Immunity for the people: the challenge of achieving high vaccine coverage in American history.

Authors:  James Colgrove
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Public health, culture, and colonial medicine: smallpox and variolation in Palestine during the British Mandate.

Authors:  Nadav Davidovitch; Zalman Greenberg
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  A history of the American Society for Clinical Investigation.

Authors:  Joel D Howell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Everything in moderation, even hype: learning from vaccine controversies to strike a balance with CRISPR.

Authors:  Shawna Benston
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.