Literature DB >> 16170476

Evaluation of polymerization-dependent changes in color and translucency of resin composites using two formulae.

Rade D Paravina1, Mikio Kimura, John M Powers.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate polymerization-dependent changes in the color and translucency parameter (TP) of resin composites and to compare results obtained using two color-difference metric formulae, CIELAB and CIEDE 2000. Twenty-eight shades of commercial resin composites were analyzed. Specimens (n = 5) were made as discs, 11 mm in diameter and 2-mm thick, using cylindrical molds. Data were collected before and after composite polymerization, using a spectrophotometer. In regard to in vitro color changes of composites (DeltaE*) a DeltaE76 of 3.7 or greater was considered to be an unacceptable color change. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance, and Fisher's protected least significant difference (PLSD) intervals for comparison of means were calculated at the 0.05 level of significance. Mean polymerization-dependent differences in color were DeltaE00 = 4.48 (2.11) and DeltaE76 = 5.51 (2.68). The DeltaTP00 range was 2.57, while the DeltaTP76 range was 2.89. Mean polymerization-dependent differences in translucency were DeltaTP00 = 0.84 (0.77) and DeltaTP76 = 0.87 (0.76). Analysis of variance showed significant differences among composites, shades, and their interactions (P < 0.0001; power = 1.0). Regression equations and r values for the two color-difference formulae and all evaluated TP values showed very strong correlation. In conclusion, within the limitations of this study, polymerization-dependent changes in color and translucency were highly varied. The majority of shades showed polymerization-dependent differences in color higher than the DeltaE76 = 3.7. The TP generally increased after light polymerization by light activation. The very strong correlation (r > 0.97) between the two color-difference formulae indicates that the limitations of the CIELAB system do not appear to be a problem when evaluating composites; however, recorded differences between DeltaE76 and DeltaE00 values stress the importance of data conversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170476     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-005-0048-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  17 in total

1.  Curing-dependent changes in color and translucency parameter of composite bleach shades.

Authors:  Rade D Paravina; Joe C Ontiveros; John M Powers
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.843

2.  Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative materials.

Authors:  W M Johnston; M H Reisbick
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry.

Authors:  W M Johnston; E C Kao
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Color stability of light-cured and post-cured composites.

Authors:  M Eldiwany; K H Friedl; J M Powers
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses.

Authors:  W M Johnston; T Ma; B H Kienle
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Color of selected shades of composites by reflection spectrophotometry.

Authors:  C L Yeh; J M Powers; Y Miyagawa
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Optical properties of direct restorative materials.

Authors:  Y Miyagawa; J M Powers; W J O'Brien
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Prediction of color of an esthetic restorative material.

Authors:  Y Miyagawa; J M Powers
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Optical properties of composites of selected shades in white light.

Authors:  J M Powers; C L Yeh; Y Miyagawa
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 10.  Current trends in dental composites.

Authors:  J L Ferracane
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1995
View more
  6 in total

1.  Development of a model shade guide for primary teeth.

Authors:  R D Paravina; G Majkic; J R Stalker; S Kiat-Amnuay; J W Chen
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2008-06

2.  Domain learning naming game for color categorization.

Authors:  Doujie Li; Zhongyan Fan; Wallace K S Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Malekipour; Ala Sharafi; Shantia Kazemi; Saber Khazaei; Farzaneh Shirani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-07

4.  Relationship between Color and Translucency of Multishaded Dental Composite Resins.

Authors:  Homan Naeimi Akbar; Keyvan Moharamzadeh; Duncan J Wood; Richard Van Noort
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-26

Review 5.  Translucency changes of direct esthetic restorative materials after curing, aging and treatment.

Authors:  Yong-Keun Lee
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2016-07-14

6.  Composites associated with pulp-protection material: color-stability analysis after accelerated artificial aging.

Authors:  Diogo Rodrigues Cruvinel; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia; Simonides Consani; Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.