PURPOSE: Previous studies have established that patients with desmoplastic melanoma (DM) have thicker primary tumors. Consequently, comparisons with other forms of melanoma have been strongly biased by differences in Breslow stage. This is the first case-matched control study comparing DM with other forms of melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a database of 3,202 melanoma patients treated at one institution, 89 patients with DM and 178 case-matched control patients (2:1) were identified by matching for tumor thickness, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Clinical, pathologic, and outcome information was obtained from chart review. RESULTS: Controls were matched successfully to patients for tumor thickness, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Presentation with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or IV disease is less common in patients with DM compared to case-matched control patients (5% v 21%; P < .001). Re-excisions to obtain clear surgical margins are required more often in patients with DM compared to case-matched control patients (21% v 6%; P < .001). Risk of positive sentinel nodes is lower in patients with DM compared to case-matched control patients (8% v 34%; P = .013). Despite these differences, survival rates of patients with DM are the same as case-matched control patients. CONCLUSION: Use of case-matched control patients matched for tumor thickness avoids biases introduced by the advanced Breslow stage of DMs. DMs are more locally aggressive than thickness-matched controls, and positive sentinel nodes are limited to patients with thick primary tumors. Importantly, patients with DM have survival rates similar to patients with other melanomas of similar thickness.
PURPOSE: Previous studies have established that patients with desmoplastic melanoma (DM) have thicker primary tumors. Consequently, comparisons with other forms of melanoma have been strongly biased by differences in Breslow stage. This is the first case-matched control study comparing DM with other forms of melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a database of 3,202 melanomapatients treated at one institution, 89 patients with DM and 178 case-matched control patients (2:1) were identified by matching for tumor thickness, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Clinical, pathologic, and outcome information was obtained from chart review. RESULTS: Controls were matched successfully to patients for tumor thickness, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Presentation with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or IV disease is less common in patients with DM compared to case-matched control patients (5% v 21%; P < .001). Re-excisions to obtain clear surgical margins are required more often in patients with DM compared to case-matched control patients (21% v 6%; P < .001). Risk of positive sentinel nodes is lower in patients with DM compared to case-matched control patients (8% v 34%; P = .013). Despite these differences, survival rates of patients with DM are the same as case-matched control patients. CONCLUSION: Use of case-matched control patients matched for tumor thickness avoids biases introduced by the advanced Breslow stage of DMs. DMs are more locally aggressive than thickness-matched controls, and positive sentinel nodes are limited to patients with thick primary tumors. Importantly, patients with DM have survival rates similar to patients with other melanomas of similar thickness.
Authors: Maki Yamamoto; Kate J Fisher; Joyce Y Wong; Jonathan M Koscso; Monique A Konstantinovic; Nicholas Govsyeyev; Jane L Messina; Amod A Sarnaik; C Wayne Cruse; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dale Han; Jonathan S Zager; Daohai Yu; Xiuhua Zhao; Brooke Walls; Suroosh S Marzban; Nikhil G Rao; Vernon K Sondak; Jane L Messina Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: N Narita; A Tanemura; R Murali; R A Scolyer; S Huang; T Arigami; S Yanagita; K K Chong; J F Thompson; D L Morton; D S Hoon Journal: Oncogene Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Lucy L Chen; Natalia Jaimes; Christopher A Barker; Klaus J Busam; Ashfaq A Marghoob Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 11.527