Literature DB >> 16170061

Patients' motivations for treatment and their experiences of orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery.

A C Williams1, H Shah, J R Sandy, H C Travess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine patients' motivations for undergoing orthognathic surgery and their experiences of the orthodontic aspects of this treatment.
DESIGN: Retrospective questionnaire survey using a patient-centred measure.
SETTING: Thirteen National Health Service (NHS) hospital orthodontic departments.
SUBJECTS: Three-hundred-and-twenty-six patients (58% response rate) who underwent orthognathic surgery during the period 1 January 1995 to 30 September 2001 completed a questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motivations for treatment and perception of information about treatment and experiences of orthodontic treatment.
RESULTS: Major motivations for treatment were to have straight teeth (80%), to prevent future dental problems (69%) and to improve self-confidence (68%). Females sought treatment to improve self-confidence and their smile. Males wanted treatment to improve their social life. Most of these issues had improved following surgery. Most (94%) respondents felt well-informed about their orthodontics. However, 36% wore braces for longer than they expected. Males and younger patients knew less about the duration of treatment than other groups. Fifty-eight per cent of subjects found their braces difficult to clean and 9% reported that they were very painful. Older patients experienced fewer problems wearing braces than younger patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Improving dental appearance and preventing future dental problems are major motivators for orthognathic patients. Although patients felt well informed about what to expect from their orthodontic treatment, a significant proportion, particularly younger patients and males, were surprised at the length of treatment and the need to wear retainers. This suggests that orthognathic patients might benefit from better information regarding the orthodontic aspects of their care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170061     DOI: 10.1179/146531205225021096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of Patient's Personal Reasons and Experience with Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Sandeep Sharma; Sameer Narkhede; Shushma Sonawane; Parag Gangurde
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Satisfaction audit of patients undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis with extra-oral distraction appliances.

Authors:  Renu Datta; Ashok Utreja; S P Singh; Vidya Rattan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-12-21

Review 3.  Orthognathic correction of dento-facial discrepancies.

Authors:  S J Cunningham; A Johal
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Changes in quality of life and their relation to cephalometric changes in orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alice Martin; Johanne Gregersen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: the important variables affecting patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Ziyad Eke; Andreas Bremerich
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09

Review 6.  Oral health-related quality of life in patients with dentofacial deformity: a new concept in decision-making treatment?

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Maria Gabriela Haye Biazevic; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-28

7.  Sex differences in esthetic treatment needs in American black and white adolescent orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Edward F Harris
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine.

Authors:  Ahmet Oğuz Şahan; Burçin Akan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Assessing anteroposterior basal bone discrepancy with the Dental Aesthetic Index.

Authors:  Boyen Huang; Katsu Takahashi; Toru Yamazaki; Kazuyuki Saito; Masashi Yamori; Keita Asai; Yusuke Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Kamioka; Takashi Yamashiro; Kazuhisa Bessho
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Satisfaction with orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Filiz Keles; Annemieke Bos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.