Literature DB >> 16170058

A 2-year outcome audit of a versatile orthodontic bone anchor.

M Y Mommaerts1, M L E Michiels, G A De Pauw.   

Abstract

This study examined complications leading to, or possibly leading to, treatment failure, related to the use of the orthodontic bone anchor (OBA). The OBA is a potential means of providing absolute anchorage and consists of a base-plate fixed with mono-cortical screws, a neck piercing the soft tissues, and a coronal part with conventional orthodontic hooks, tubes or slots. The investigation took the form of a single centre prospective registry at a supra-regional teaching hospital. Eighteen patients (average age 21 years) had one to four OBAs placed between January 2000 and February 2002. Altogether 35 OBAs were placed. Follow-up took place until April 2004. Reasons for placing the OBAs were noted together with any associated complications during the follow-up period. Twenty-three OBAs have been removed so far, four prematurely (one of them before it was taken into use, due to a change of treatment plan enforced by loss of the contralateral OBA). Nineteen were removed as planned after completion of the intended tooth movements. Common (but minor) complications included granulations, acute gingivitis and gingival recession. Light mobility of the OBA was also noted in some cases, but without clinical repercussions. The OBA can be loaded directly, at the level of the orthodontic archwire or more occlusally. It can be placed at any site at the circumference of the jaws, given good quality and thickness of the bony wall. Conventional biomechanical techniques can be applied. However, the failure rate (premature loss of OBA) of 8.6% is considered high, and has necessitated changes in the hardware and protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170058     DOI: 10.1179/146531205225021060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  3 in total

1.  Sagittal skeletal correction using symphyseal miniplate anchorage systems : Success rates and complications.

Authors:  Seçil Çubuk; Burçak Kaya; Zahire Şahinoğlu; Ufuk Ateş; Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı; Sina Uçkan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  FEM analysis of a new miniplate: stress distribution on the plate, screws and the bone.

Authors:  Didem Nalbantgil; Murat Tozlu; Fulya Ozdemir; Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak; Tulin Arun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-01

3.  Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Georgios Kanavakis; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.151

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.